bryce worked 8 hours on monday, 4 14 hours on tuesday, 6 1/8 hours on wednesday, 7 14 hours on thursday, and 8 18 hours on friday. calculate the total number of hours bryce worked for the week.

Answer:48

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

Directrix, d= -5, and eccentricity, e = 2.

The polar equation of the conic is given by :

\(r=\dfrac{ed}{1-e\cos\theta}\)

Put all the values,

\(r=\dfrac{-5\times 2}{1-2\cos\theta}\\\\=\dfrac{-10}{1-2\cos\theta}\)

As e>1, it is a hyperbola. Hence, this is the required solution.

The strategy defined in part a is superior to go for 1 point after each touchdown for p > 0.362. Hence, the required answer is 0.362.

a. Set of States for the situation in which Temple's coach attempts a 2-point conversion after the first touchdown will be:{-2,-1,0,1,2, W, L} where L stands for loss and W stands for win.

-2 stands for down by 16 points-1 stands for down by 15 points0 stands for down by 14 points1 stands for down by 13 points2 stands for down by 12 points

W stands for a win

L stands for a loss tree Diagram for the given situation and can be shown as Tree diagram for Temple Wildcats' 2-point conversion

b. Transition Probability matrix for this decision problem in part (a) is shown below:

$$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline From/To & -14 & -8 & -6 & 0 & WIN & LOSE\\ \hline -2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1-p & 0 & 0\\ \hline -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1-p & 0 & 0\\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1-p & 0 & 0\\ \hline 1 & 0 & 0 & p & 1-p & 0 & 0\\ \hline 2 & 0 & p & 1-p & 1-p & 0 & 0\\ \hline WIN & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ \hline LOSE & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\\ \hline \end{array}c.

As per the given situation, Temple needs to score two touchdowns to win the game, and coach must decide whether to attempt a 1-point or 2-point conversion after each touchdown.

If the coach goes for a 1-point conversion after each touchdown, the game is assured of going to overtime and Temple will win with a probability of 0.53.

Let us calculate the probability of winning if the coach goes for a 2-point conversion after the first touchdown.

If Temple attempts a 2-point conversion after the first touchdown, they can win if they score 2 points after the second touchdown or if they score 1 point after the second touchdown and win the game in overtime.

So, the probability of winning, in this case, can be calculated as: P(win) = P(2-point conversion is successful and 1-point conversion is successful in next touchdown) + P(2-point conversion is successful and Temple wins in overtime)P(win) = p * (1-p) + p * 0.53P(win) = p - p² + 0.53p

Now, let us calculate the probability of winning if Temple goes for a 1-point conversion after each touchdown.P(win) = 0.53

Therefore, the strategy defined in part a is superior to go for 1 point after each touchdown for p > 0.362. Hence, the required answer is 0.362.

Know more about Tree diagram here:

https://brainly.com/question/24391505

#SPJ11

The slope of the line that goes through the origin and the point (6, -4) is -2/3.

To find the slope of a line that goes through two given points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂), you can use the formula:

slope = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

In this case, one of the points is the origin, which has coordinates (0, 0), so x₁ = 0 and y₂ = 0. The other point is (6, -4), so x₂ = 6 and y₂ = -4. Substituting these values into the slope formula gives:

slope = (-4 - 0) / (6 - 0) = -4/6 = -2/3

To learn more about slope click on,

https://brainly.com/question/27924340

#SPJ1

Answer: 675ft

Step-by-step explanation: 614 + 61 (since it’s below sea level) =675ft

Answer:

that's 3 unit s so because it's 3.5 but round it up and u get 3

The height of the painting in the scale drawing is approximately 5.8 centimeters (rounded to the nearest tenth).

To find the height of the painting in the scale drawing, we can set up a proportion using the given scale.

Given:

Scale: 2 centimeters represent 9 inches

Real height of the painting: 26 inches

Height in the scale drawing: ?

Let's set up the proportion:

2 centimeters / 9 inches = x centimeters / 26 inches

To solve for x (the height in the scale drawing), we can cross-multiply and then divide:

2 centimeters * 26 inches = 9 inches * x centimeters

52 centimeters = 9x

Dividing both sides by 9:

x = 52 centimeters / 9

x ≈ 5.8 centimeters

For more such questions on height

https://brainly.com/question/73194

#SPJ8

The dimensions of the rectangle are width = 7/2 meters and length = 4 meters.

Let's assume that the width of the rectangle is x meters. According to the given information, the length of the rectangle is 3 meters less than double the width, which can be expressed as 2x - 3.

The area of a rectangle is given by the formula: Area = Length × Width. In this case, the area is given as 14 m². Therefore, we can write the equation:

(x)(2x - 3) = 14

Expanding the equation:

2x² - 3x = 14

Rearranging the equation to standard form:

2x² - 3x - 14 = 0

To solve this quadratic equation, we can factor it or use the quadratic formula. In this case, let's use the quadratic formula:

x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / (2a)

In our equation, a = 2, b = -3, and c = -14. Plugging in these values into the quadratic formula:

x = (-(-3) ± √((-3)² - 4(2)(-14))) / (2(2))

x = (3 ± √(9 + 112)) / 4

x = (3 ± √121) / 4

x = (3 ± 11) / 4

Simplifying further:

x = (3 + 11) / 4 or x = (3 - 11) / 4

x = 14 / 4 or x = -8 / 4

x = 7/2 or x = -2

Since the width cannot be negative, we discard the negative solution. Therefore, the width of the rectangle is 7/2 meters.

Now, we can substitute the value of x into the expression for the length:

Length = 2x - 3

Length = 2(7/2) - 3

Length = 7 - 3

Length = 4 meters

Thus, the dimensions of the rectangle are width = 7/2 meters and length = 4 meters.

for more such question on rectangle visit

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ8

If a washer and dryer cost $750 and the cost of the washer is two times the cost of the dryer, then the cost of the dryer $250

The total cost of a washer and dryer combined = $750

The cost of the dryer = x

The cost of the washer is two times the cost of the dryer.

The cost of the washer = 2x

Then the equation will be

x + 2x = 750

Add the like terms of the equation

3x = 750

Move 3 to the right hand side of the equation

x = 750/3

x = $250

Hence, if a washer and dryer cost $750 and the cost of the washer is two times the cost of the dryer, then the cost of the dryer $250

The complete question is:

A washer and dryer cost $750 combined the cost of the washer is two times the cost of the dryer what is the cost of the dryer?

Learn more about equation here

brainly.com/question/14603559

#SPJ4

Answer:

a rational number

Step-by-step explanation:

a rational number + a rational number will always be a rational number.

The number of spanning trees of a connected graph can be proven to be the product of the number of spanning trees of each of its blocks.

Here are the steps-

1. Consider a connected graph G with blocks B1, B2, ..., Bk. Each block is a maximal connected subgraph with no cut-vertex.

2. The number of spanning trees of G can be denoted as T(G), and the number of spanning trees of each block Bi can be denoted as T(Bi).

3. To prove the given statement, we need to show that\(T(G) = T(B1) * T(B2) * ... * T(Bk).\)

4. We can start by considering a single block B1. Since B1 is a maximal connected subgraph with no cut-vertex, it is a connected graph on its own.

5. The number of spanning trees of B1, T(B1), can be calculated using any method such as Kirchhoff's theorem or counting the number of spanning trees directly.

6. Now, consider the original graph G. We can remove block B1 from G, which leaves us with a graph G' that consists of the remaining blocks B2, B3, ..., Bk.

7. G' is still a connected graph, but it may have cut-vertices. However, the removal of B1 does not affect the connectivity between the other blocks, as each block is a maximal connected subgraph.

8. The number of spanning trees of G', denoted as T(G'), can be calculated using the same method as step 5.

9. Since G' is the remaining part of G after removing B1, the number of spanning trees of G can be expressed as T(G) = T(B1) * T(G').

10. We can repeat this process for the remaining blocks B2, B3, ..., Bk. For each block Bi, we remove it from G and calculate the number of spanning trees of the remaining graph.

11. By repeating steps 6-10 for all blocks, we can express the number of spanning trees of G as-

\(T(G) = T(B1) * T(G')\)

\(= T(B1) * T(B2) * T(G'')\)

= ...

\(= T(B1) * T(B2) * ... * T(Bk).\)

12. Therefore, we have proved that the number of spanning trees of a connected graph G is the product of the number of spanning trees of each of its blocks.

To know more on Kirchhoff's theorem visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30201571

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Look at the last term, - 28.

It means, the product of roots is a positive number (28).

The polynomial is a degree three so it has 3 possible roots.

Positive product can be obtained if all 3 numbers are positive or 2 negative and 1 positive.

Therefore number of positive roots is one or three.

Further, double check using the graphical solution (see attached), it shows one root only. It means the other roots are complex.

Correct option is A

Answer:6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

25/35 = .71 = 71%

Step-by-step explanation:

The term that suggests that the threat of loss has a greater impact on a decision than the possibility of an equivalent gain is prospect theory.

Prospect theory is a theory that describes how individuals make decisions under uncertainty. The theory suggests that people think about gains and losses differently and that the value they assign to a particular change in their situation depends on their current situation. The theory is based on the observation that people often violate the principle of expected utility. They make decisions that do not maximize their expected utility. The theory suggests that people evaluate outcomes based on changes from a reference point, rather than in absolute terms. This means that people are more sensitive to changes in their situation than to the situation itself.

For example, a loss of $100 is more painful than the pleasure of gaining $100, and the pleasure of gaining $100 is less than the pain of losing $100.

In summary, Prospect theory suggests that the threat of a loss has a greater impact on a decision than the possibility of an equivalent gain.

Learn more about prospect theory from:

https://brainly.com/question/29451765

#SPJ11

Answer:

There is no value but it really depends on the equation, Usually it is 1 if x is alone since the 1 is “ invisible “.

Answer:

32 cubic \(cm^{3}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Since each cube is 1 by 1 we can just count blocks to get its width length and height.

Width = 2

Length = 4

Height = 4

Volume= LxWxH

Volume= 4x2x4

Volume = 32 cubic \(cm^{3}\)

The radius of convergence R is zero. Answer: R = 0.

Given function is 5 square root (1 - x)

To use the binomial series to expand the function as a power series, we first simplify the function.5 square root (1 - x) can be rewritten as 5(1 - x)^0.5

Using the formula

(1 + x)^n = 1 + nx + (n(n-1)/2!)(x^2) + ..... + (n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-k+1))/(k!)(x^k)

Here, a = 1, b = -x, m = 0.5

And the series is (1 - x)^0.5 = sigma^infinity _n=0 (1/2)_n/ (n!)x^nwhere (1/2)_n represents the falling factorial.Here, we have 5 outside the series, and so, the expansion of the given function as a power series is5(1 - x)^0.5 = 5 sigma^infinity _n=0 (1/2)_n/ (n!)x^n = sigma^infinity _n=0 (5(1/2)_n/ (n!))(x^n)

Therefore, the series is 5 sigma^infinity _n=0 (1/2)_n/ (n!)x^n, which represents the expansion of the function as a power series.The radius of convergence R is given by:

R = lim_n→∞ |(5(1/2)_n+1)/ ((n+1)!)/(5(1/2)_n/ (n!)|R = lim_n→∞ (5(1/2))/(n+1) = 0

To know more about function:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

1) Find the perimeters of the square and the triangle.

Suppose you divide the wire into 2 pieces that measure x and y. x is used to make the square and y is used to make the triangle, according to the figure:

x is the perimeter of the square;

y is the perimeter of the triangle.

Since the total wire is 30 inches long:

x + y = 30 (equation 1).

2) Find the area of the geometric figures.

Square:

Since a square has 4 equal sides, each side will measure x/4 (4*x/4=x)

And, since the area (As) of a square whose side measures a is:

The area of the square is:

Equilateral Triangle:

Since an equilateral triangle has 3 equal sides, each side will measure y/3 (3*y/3 = y).

And, since the area (At) of an equilateral triangle whose side measures b is:

The area of the triangle is:

3) Find the total area.

The total area (A) is the sum of the areas:

4) Isolate y in equation 1 and substitute in the equation for the area.

x + y = 30

y = 30 - x

5) The maximum or minimum value of A happens at x when dA/dx = 0.

So, derivate A:

And do dA/dx = 0 to find x.

Then, isolate x:

6) Evaluate the equation for x at the exremes x = 0; y = 30, and at x = 13.

For x = 0

For x = 30

And for x =13

7) Compare the results:

As you can see in step 6, when x = 13, the area is minimized, while the area is maximized when x = 30.

The greatest area will be reached when x = 30. That means y = 0 (x + y =30).

Answer:

The greatest area is reached when all the wire is used to make the square.

To make the 2 figures, we wire should be cut as nearest as possible to 30, and the greatest piece should be used to make the square.

Both the computation of out-degrees and in-degrees in a directed graph represented as an adjacency-list can be done in O(V+E) time complexity.

In an adjacency-list representation of a directed graph, the out-degree of a vertex is simply the number of adjacent vertices in the list, while the in-degree of a vertex is the number of times it appears in the lists of adjacent vertices for other vertices in the graph.
To compute the out-degree of every vertex, we need to iterate through each vertex in the graph and count the number of adjacent vertices in its adjacency list. This can be done in O(V+E) time complexity, where V is the number of vertices and E is the number of edges in the graph. This is because we need to visit each vertex once, and for each vertex, we need to examine all its adjacent vertices.
On the other hand, to compute the in-degrees of every vertex, we need to iterate through each vertex in the graph and count the number of times it appears in the adjacency lists of other vertices. This can also be done in O(V+E) time complexity, as we need to examine each vertex once and count the number of times it appears in the adjacency lists of all other vertices.
In summary, both the computation of out-degrees and in-degrees in a directed graph represented as an adjacency-list can be done in O(V+E) time complexity.

for more questions on graph

https://brainly.com/question/17089414

#SPJ11

Answer:

They will each get 7 trout.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since there are two people (Nancy and Jason), take the 14 trout, and divide it amongst the two, so, they each get 7 fish.

There is no solution to the system. This means that the equation 2 = -2 in the system is inconsistent.

What is a system of equations?

A system of equations is a collection of two or more equations that are solved simultaneously. Each equation in the system represents a constraint or condition that must be satisfied, and a solution to the system is a set of values that satisfies all of the equations in the system simultaneously.

If you attempt to solve a system of equations and you get a statement like 2 = -2, it means that the equations in the system are inconsistent. An inconsistent system of equations has no solution because there is no set of values that can simultaneously satisfy all of the equations.

Hence, as these equations are contradictory, there is no solution to the system. This means that the equations in the system are inconsistent.

To learn more about the system of equations, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ4

By definition of proportion, Out of a total of 75,000 voters, there are 43,000 predict will vote against Issue 1

Given that Out of a random sample of 300 voters, it was found that 172 voters are in favor of Issue

Now,

Let number of vote against Issue #1 for total 75,000 = x

Hence, By definition of proportion we get;

⇒ 300 / 172 = 75,000 / x

⇒ 300x = 75,000 × 172

⇒ 300x = 12,900,000

⇒ x = 43,000

Therefore, by definition of proportion, Out of a total of 75,000 voters, there are 43,000 predict will vote against Issue 1

To learn more on Ratios click:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ1

Out of a random sample of 300 voters, it was found that 172 voters are in favor of Issue #1.

Out of a total of 75,000 voters, how many do you predict will vote against Issue #1?

It is predicted that ___

voters are against Issue #1.

A- 30,000

B- 32,000

C- 43,000

D- 60,000

Answer:

0.0022x

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

The credit card company raised her APR from 14% to 15.2%.

Her average daily balance this month is x dollars.

We need to find the algebraically the increase in this month's finance charge due to the higher APR. It can be calculated as follows :

\(y=x\times \dfrac{12\%}{14}-x\times \dfrac{15.2\%}{14}\\\\=x\times \dfrac{12}{1400}-x\times \dfrac{15.2}{1400}\\\\=-0.0022x\)

So, the required increase in the month's finance is 0.0022x.

Answer:

0.001x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think the answer is 200

The explanatory variable is the variable that is being manipulated or controlled by the experimenter in order to get its effect on the response variable, which is the variable being measured or observed.

the experimenter is randomly assigning students to seat locations in the classroom, so the row assignment is being manipulated. the experimenter is trying to remove the possibility that the relationship between seating location and test scores is due to some other variable, like student ability or motivation.

If there is a significant difference in test scores between the different rows, then it may be to conclude that seating location has a causal effect on test scores.

To learn about the explanatory variable visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29820449

#SPJ4

93 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

93 oz.

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming we are converting this into all ounces (oz), 5 lbs and 13 oz. = 93 oz. There are 16 oz in a pound.

Answer:

x=6

y= -4

Step-by-step explanation:

one of this equations we have to isolate a variable on one side

2x+5y=-8

   -5y.  -5y

2x=-5y-8

/2.  /2.  /2

x=-2.5y-4

Now we can fill in X into first equation

5(-2.5y-4)+2y=22

-12.5y-20+2y=22

-10.5y-20=22

         +20. +20

-10.5y=42

/-10.5. /-10.5

y= -4

Now we can use this to find x

5x+2(-4)=22

5x-8=22

  +8.  +8

5x=30

/5. /5

x=6

Hopes this helps please mark brainliest

The values of x and y are 6 and -4 respectively.

The substitution method works on the principle of substituting one variable in place of another.

The first equation is 5x + 2y = 22. Isolating x from this equation we have,        x= 22 - 2y / 5.

Substituting x in equation 2, that is, 2x + 5y = -8, we have

2( 22 - 2y / 5) + 5y = -8.

Simplifying,  44 - 4y / 5 + 5y = -8

44 + 21y = -40

21y = -84

y = -4.

Substituting the value of y = -4 in equation 1, we get

x = 22 - 2( -8 ) / 5

x = 40/5

x = 6.

Hence the values of x and y are 6 and -4 respectively.

To know more about similar questions on substitution method, refer to this:

brainly.com/question/29333936

Answer:

33.3333%

Step-by-step explanation:

Total number of kg- 2+3=5

Total money- (2×8)=16

(3×6)=18

16+18=34

$34=5000g

=250g

(250×$34)÷5000=$1.7

profit-2.55-1.7=0.85

(0.85/2.55)×100=33.333%

The best answer regarding the effects of carbon monoxide is option c, CO results in less oxygen loading hemoglobin but unloading is not changed.

Carbon monoxide binds up more tightly to the hemoglobin as compared to the oxygen molecules. This reduces the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood and results in less oxygen loading onto hemoglobin.

However, once oxygen is already bound to hemoglobin, CO does not significantly affect its release or unloading. Therefore, option c is the most accurate statement among the given choices.

To know more about Carbon monoxide in blood, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/29233528

#SPJ4