difference between primary data and secondry data

Answer:

I dont live in Colorado but if I were you and I was concerned about failing or getting held back I would ask the school or your parents, where I live if we fail we have to redue it with the permission of our parents or summer school your forced to go just depends.

The intervals suggest that both income and the age of the oldest family automobile are significantly associated with the odds of buying a new car.

How to explain the hypothesis

a. The confidence intervals for the odds ratio of buying a new car for families whose incomes differ by 20 thousand dollars and for the age of the oldest family automobile are as follows:

Income: (1.25, 3.75)

Age of oldest automobile: (1.10, 1.90)

These intervals suggest that both income and the age of the oldest family automobile are significantly associated with the odds of buying a new car.

b. The Wald test for whether X2, age of oldest family automobile, can be dropped from the regression model is as follows:

Test statistic = 2.25

P-value = 0.13

Since the P-value is greater than 0.05, we cannot reject the null hypothesis that X2 does not have a significant effect on the odds of buying a new car. Therefore, we cannot conclude that X2 can be dropped from the regression model.

c. The likelihood ratio test for whether X2, age of oldest family automobile, can be dropped from the regression model is as follows:

Test statistic = 2.25

P-value = 0.13

This result is identical to the result obtained for the Wald test in part (b). This is because the Wald test and the likelihood ratio test are asymptotically equivalent, meaning that they will have the same distribution as the sample size gets larger.

d. The likelihood ratio test for whether the following three second-order terms, the square of annual family income, the square of the age of the oldest family automobile, and the interaction between income and age, can be dropped from the regression model is as follows:

Test statistic = 12.6

P-value = 0.002

Since the P-value is less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis that these three terms do not have a significant effect on the odds of buying a new car. Therefore, we can conclude that these three terms cannot be dropped from the regression model.

Learn more about hypothesis on

https://brainly.com/question/606806

#SPJ1

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer:

In the long term it could make more money

Explanation:

It might be a good financial decision because you might get certificates and degrees you need to work at a job thats pays a lot of money. Going to College opens up many opportunities for more money.

Since 60° is one-sixth (1/6) of 360°, then the length of the arc subtended by a central angle of 60° is one-sixth (1/6) of the circumference of the circle.

No ppt is formed.

BaCl2 and NaCl(the products formed) are highly soluble in water due to the ionic bond present in their bond causing high polarity.

Answer:

Balance

Explanation:

Note : -

The cerebellum controls voluntary movements such as:

walking.

posture.

balance.

coordination.

eye movements.

speech.

These are affected if cerebellum is damaged.

Answer:

it's balance cause the cerebellum controls voluntary movement which for example is walking

Answer:

The probability of getting a girl is 12 . The probability of getting 6 girls is therefore (12)6 . Since we have 6 girls, we also need to find the probability of getting 2 boys, which is (12)2 . There are (86)=28 ways to get 6 girls out of 8 children.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

P(X > 6) = ?

P(X > 6) = P(X = 6) + P(X = 7) + P(X = 8)

P(X > 6) = 0.118 + 0.035 + 0.004

P(X > 6) = 0.157

Thus the probability of getting 6 or more girls in 8 births is 0.157

Explanation:

As a member of the US Congress, I believe that TikT ok poses a potential threat to national security due to its ownership by a Chinese company, and its ability to collect data on American citizens. While it has become a popular platform for entertainment and social networking, it is important to consider the risks associated with allowing a foreign company to have access to personal information of American citizens. Therefore, I support measures to regulate and monitor TikTok's activities in the United States.

Restrictive measures should be taken to ensure that user data is not being compromised or used for malicious purposes. This may include increased oversight by government agencies, mandatory transparency and accountability measures for TikT ok's operations, and possible restrictions on the use of TikT ok by government officials and employees. Additionally, we should encourage American companies to develop alternative platforms that prioritize user privacy and data security. While we must balance the benefits of technological innovation with the risks of national security, the safety and security of American citizens must remain our top priority.

The random variable X represents the number of hours Americans spend watching television each month.

In the given scenario, 108 Americans were surveyed, and it was found that they watched an average of 151 hours each month, with a standard deviation of 32 hours. The random variable X helps us quantify and describe the distribution of this data. By defining X as the number of hours spent watching television, we can analyze and make inferences about the population's television viewing habits. The random variable X in this scenario represents the number of hours an individual American spends watching television each month. Each survey respondent's value of X corresponds to the number of hours they reported watching TV. The random variable X allows us to quantify and analyze the variability in TV viewing habits among the surveyed American population.

Learn more about variable here

https://brainly.com/question/12869971

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. They release a poison from their spines.

Explanation:

Plz mark Brainliest, thx!

The options that are equal to the root √3/2 are options A and C.

Given √3/2 is the value.

To Find  -  The angles for which √3/2  is the value.

Solution  -

Sin60° = √3/2

Tan60° = √3

Cos30° = √3/2

Cos90° = 0

Hence,   is the value of Sin60° and Cos30°. Options A and C.

Learn more about Roots at:

https://brainly.com/question/428672

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

Which of the following is equal to √3/2

(Select one or more answers)

Ans:

sin 60°

tan 60°

cos 30°

cos 90°

The value of ac in this quadratic equation (3x - 8)(x + 5) is -120.

In Mathematics, the standard form of a quadratic equation is given by the following mathematical expression:

ax² + bx + c = 0    ......equation 1.

Therefore, we would expand the bracket as follows:

(3x - 8)(x + 5) = 0

3x² + 15x - 8x - 40 = 0

3x² + 17x - 40 = 0     .....equation 2.

By comparing equation 1 and equation 2, we have the following parameters:

a = 3

b = 17

c = -40

For the value of ac, we have:

ac = 3 × (-40)

ac = -120.

Read more on quadratic equation here: https://brainly.com/question/3404535

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

If (3x - 8)(x + 5) = ax² + bx + c, what is the value of ac (please show work

Answer:

The three policymakers are expressing different views on what a just distribution of the national cake entails, which could stem from different perspectives, values, and beliefs about justice and fairness.

The first policymaker believes in equal distribution, which implies that everyone should receive the same amount of resources regardless of their needs, abilities, and contributions. This perspective is based on the principle of equality, which holds that all individuals are equal and should be treated equally. It seeks to address inequalities and reduce poverty by leveling the playing field and ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities to access basic necessities.

The second policymaker believes in fair distribution, which implies that resources should be distributed in a way that takes into account individual differences and needs. This perspective is based on the principle of fairness, which holds that individuals should be treated in a manner that is consistent with their needs and contributions. It seeks to address inequalities by ensuring that resources are distributed in a way that is proportionate to individual needs and contributions.

The third policymaker believes in giving everyone their due, which implies that individuals should receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities. This perspective is based on the principle of distributive justice, which holds that individuals should receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities. It seeks to address inequalities by ensuring that individuals receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities.

Making progress in such a scenario would require policymakers to find common ground and find ways to balance the principles of equality, fairness, and distributive justice. One way to make progress would be to engage in open and honest discussions to understand each other's perspectives and concerns. This would involve listening actively, asking questions, and seeking to understand the reasoning behind each policymaker's views.

Another way to make progress would be to engage in a thorough analysis of the available data and evidence on the current distribution of resources in the country. This would help policymakers to understand the extent of inequalities and the factors that contribute to them. This information would then be used to develop evidence-based policies that address inequalities and ensure a just distribution of the national cake.

A third way to make progress would be to engage in stakeholder consultations and gather the views of various groups in society, including representatives from different communities, civil society organizations, and business groups. This would provide a broad perspective on the issues and would help policymakers to understand the impact of their policies on different groups in society.

Finally, policymakers could also consider the use of multi-stakeholder partnerships, where various groups in society come together to address common problems and find mutually beneficial solutions. This would help to build trust, foster collaboration, and ensure that everyone has a voice in the policymaking process.

In conclusion, finding a just distribution of the national cake is a complex challenge that requires policymakers to balance the principles of equality, fairness, and distributive justice. By engaging in open and honest discussions, conducting evidence-based analysis, engaging in stakeholder consultations, and using multi-stakeholder partnerships, policymakers can make progress and ensure a just distribution of the national cake.

Answer:

Explanation:

The three policymakers in this scenario have different views on how to ensure a just distribution of the national cake. One believes that an equal distribution is just, another believes in a fair distribution, and the third believes that a just distribution entails giving everyone their due. These differences in perspective could be due to several factors, including their background, values, and life experiences.

The policymaker who believes in an equal distribution may come from a background where equal sharing is emphasized, or they may have a strong belief in equality and social justice. This perspective assumes that everyone has equal needs and that an equal distribution is the most just way to meet those needs.

On the other hand, the policymaker who believes in a fair distribution may take into account factors such as people's needs, abilities, and contributions to society. They may believe that people who contribute more to society should receive a larger share of the national cake or that people with greater needs should receive a larger share to help them meet those needs.

The policymaker who believes in giving everyone their due may believe in a merit-based distribution, where individuals receive a share of the national cake based on their efforts or contributions to society. This perspective assumes that individuals should be rewarded based on their merit and that a just distribution should not be based on equal or fair sharing alone.

To make progress in this scenario, the policymakers need to first recognize and respect each other's perspectives. They can then work towards finding a compromise that takes into account the strengths and limitations of each perspective.

One possible approach is to adopt a hybrid approach that combines elements of each perspective. For example, they could agree to distribute the national cake equally among all citizens, but also provide additional resources to those with greater needs or who have contributed more to society.

Another approach is to identify common values and principles that underpin each perspective, such as social justice, fairness, and merit. They could then use these values to guide their decision-making and ensure that the distribution is in line with these principles.

Finally, it is important to recognize that a just distribution of the national cake requires more than just a fair or equal distribution of resources. It also requires addressing the underlying social, economic, and political structures that create inequality and limit opportunities for some individuals and groups. Therefore, the policymakers need to work towards creating a more just and equitable society by addressing these structural issues.

The basketball athlete earned 10,000,000 dollars to play 80 games.

a) How much did the athlete earn per game

We need to divide his total income by the number of games:

10,000,000 / 80 = 125000

He makes 125000 per game.

b) Assuming the athlete played every minute of every game, how much did he earn per minute?

Now that we know how much he earns per game, we need to find how much he earned per minute considering every game has 48 minutes. So we have to multiply 48 by 80 to get the total amount of minutes of the season. 48 x 80 = 3840 minutes.

So we need to divide his income per game by the number of minutes per game:

125000 /3840 = 32.55

He earns 32.55 dollars per minute.

c) Assuming that the athlete played 2/3 of every game, how much did he earn per minute?

We need to find how many minutes of every game is 2/3.

48 minutes ----1

X------------------2/3

x= 48 x (2/3) = 32.

So he played 32 minutes per game, but since there were 80 games, he played:

32 x 80 = 2560 minutes

But he still makes 125000 per game so we are going to divide his earnings between the total of minutes he played

125000 /2560 = 48.82.

Therefore, he earned 48.82 per minute.

d) Suppose the, averaged over a year, the athlete practiced or trained 37 hours for every game and then played every minute. Including this training time, what was his hourly salary?

If he trained 37 hours, we know that every hour has 60 minutes, so 37 hours in minutes would be: 37 x 60 = 2220 minutes of training.

He played every minute of every game (we already said this was 2560 minutes)

So he had 2220 + 2560 minutes in total = 4780 minutes = 79.66 hours

Now we're going to divide this by his salary: 10,000,000/ 79.66 = 125,533

Therefore, His hourly salary was 125,533.

Learn more about hourly salary on:

https://brainly.com/question/4114612

#SPJ1

Answer:4 times 4

Explanation:  but 4^4 equals 256

Answer:c

Explanation:

c

Where the conditions above with regard to unicellular organisms are given, the best answer choices would be

The present-day relationship between the unicellular organisms and termites can be characterized as mutualism. Mutualism refers to a symbiotic relationship where both species benefit from the association.

This relationship likely formed through coevolution, which is an evolutionary phenomenon where two or more species exert selective pressure on each other, leading to reciprocal adaptations.

Learn more about unicellular organism at:

https://brainly.com/question/24540805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

Currently, a particular species of unicellular organism inhabits the intestines of termites, where the unicellular organisms are protected from predators. Wood that is ingested by the termites is digested by the unicellular organismo, forming food for the termites. However hundreds of thousands if not millions and millions of years ago, this relationship between unicellular organisms and termites did not exist. Given this information. 1) how would you best characterize this present-day relationship between unicelular organisms and termiten and 2) what evolutionary phonomena bost describes the process by which this relationship formed? Select only ONE answer choice. Select the BEST answer choice 1) mutualiam, 2) coevolution 1) parasitehost, looovolution 1) predatory convergent evolution 1) commensals 2) convergent evotion None of the above

The present-day relationship between unicellular organisms and termites is symbiotic. Symbiosis refers to a type of relationship between two or more different species, where each individual benefits from the interaction to varying degrees.

In this case, the unicellular organisms benefit from the protection provided by the termites, while the termites benefit from the food produced by the unicellular organisms.As for the second question, the evolutionary phenomena that best describes the process by which this relationship formed is coevolution.

Coevolution refers to the process by which two or more species influence each other's evolutionary trajectories through reciprocal selective pressures. As termites evolved to feed on wood, the unicellular organisms that lived in their guts evolved to digest that wood. In turn, the termites that hosted these unicellular organisms were able to extract more nutrition from the wood, which allowed them to thrive.

To know more about organisms visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13278945

#SPJ11

Answer:

There are three main reasons for European Exploration. Them being for the sake of their economy, religion and glory. They wanted to improve their economy for instance by acquiring more spices, gold, and better and faster trading routes. Also, they really believed in the need to spread their religion, Christianity.

hope it's helpful

thank you

and please follow me

Answer:

Alpha Kappa Alpha

Explanation:

?

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Not b, because it has been happening for millions of years. not c, because mountains are only above ground. and not d, because that is not usually the case.

Answer:

The south African War 1899-1902

Answer: The 'dark side' of the Moon refers to the side of the Moon that is facing away from the Earth

Explanation:

The SAT Subject Assessments were standardized tests that assessed your knowledge of the content covered in class.

Colleges utilize SAT (and ACT) results to decide who gets into their programs and who gets scholarships. For admissions and course placement, colleges use the results of the SAT Subject Test. Selective colleges could advise you to take one or more Subject Tests or require you to do so.

The three portions of the SAT measure your abilities in arithmetic, writing and language, and reading comprehension. The sections each contain content on a variety of topics. The five general subject areas on the SAT subject test are science, math, English, history, and foreign languages.

To know more about SAT visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11610862

#SPJ1

the prophet Muhammad is called Allah

Answer:

The third side of each triangle will be √152−122=9. Now you know that all three pairs of sides are congruent, so the triangles are congruent by SSS. In general, anytime you have the hypotenuses congruent and one pair of legs congruent for two right triangles, the triangles are congruent

Okay this is like Science or Chemistery, probably Sience

Answer:

So say you have some cold water running, if you turn on the hot water than the hot water will start coming too. The energy of the hot water will start warming up the cold water.

Explanation:

I don't really know, just tossing reasonable stuff out here.

Answer:

B Right or power to make a choice

Explanation:

Patrick Henry writes, "...we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now to late to retire from the contest." He is saying that they have no choice to "retire from the contest"

Base on what the writer, he use the no election and election means right or power to make a choice. By putting the word no it means they have no choice or power to make a choice then to face what's coming . option B.

This was the speech given by Patrick henry one of the founding fathers of America and the first governor of Virginia.  

He was major figure in the American Revolution, his rousing speeches which included a 1775 speech to the Virginia legislature in which he famously declared, “Give me liberty, or give me death! .is war of no choice but to fight that led to  fired up America’s fight for independence.

Learn more about Patrick Henry herebrainly.com/question/8708670

#SPJ1

Answer:

5

Explanation:

Word problem.

First statememt

n/2 - 4 = -6. ....... (1)

Second statement.

3n + 7 = x. ....... (2)

From (1)

n/2 - 4 = -6.

n/2 = -6 +4

n/2 = -2

n= -4

Put n into (2).

3n + 7 = x

3(-4) +7 = x

x= -12 +7 = -5

The answer is -5.

Without the specific context or paragraph mentioned, it is challenging to provide an accurate analysis of the phrase "Business would pick up then." However, in a general sense, the phrase implies an expectation or prediction that the business will improve or become more active in the future.

The phrase "Business would pick up then" suggests that there is a belief or anticipation that certain conditions or circumstances will change, leading to an increase in business activity. It could imply that the current situation or factors are hindering business growth or profitability, but there is an optimistic outlook for the future.

The phrase might be used in various contexts. For example, it could refer to a slow period for a particular industry or company, where the expectation is that economic conditions, market demand, or other factors will improve, leading to an upturn in business activity.

However, without the specific paragraph or context in which the phrase is used, it is important to consider the surrounding information to accurately interpret its meaning. The phrase can have different connotations depending on the overall context and the specific industry or situation being referred to.

For more such questions on analysis, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/26843597

#SPJ8