Discuss why a consensual definition of law has been difficult?

Answer:

a member of congress

Explanation:

I think im not 100% though

Answer:

Legal Opinion Law Chambers is a law firm based in Lahore,which specializes in advising family laws i.e Divorce, Child Custody, Maintinance of Children, Recovery Of Dower(Haq Maher),Recovery Of Dowery Articles(Saman Jahez), Court Marriage, Succession Certificate, Legal Heirs Declaration, Civil laws, Criminal laws, as well as Property and Tax issues. Best Lawyers in Lahore especially For Family Laws.

Answer:

Yes, I would Create the second amendment because at the time there were not fast response times for law enforcement.

Explanation:

This was necessary so that Americans could protect themselves from any intruder or have a secondary way to protect themselves in public.

It is important for all the motorists to stay updated with the traffic laws and driving techniques in order to maximize the safety while driving on the roads.

The laws which are implemented by the relevant authorities to control the methods of driving, and are backed by rules and regulations as well as penalties and punishments while driving on the road, are traffic laws.

The traffic laws are applicable to the motorists (those who drive vehicles on the road) as well as to the pedestrians (those who walk, run or cycle on the road).

Hence, the significance of traffic laws are aforementioned.

Learn more about traffic laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/8890043

#SPJ1

Carter was stopped by the police and accidentally mistaken as a wanted criminal. If he were to sue, civil law would be applicable.

What is civil law?

Civil law is an international legal system. The fundamental source of law is a referable system that contains the key principles of Roman law. Roman law serves as the intellectual underpinning for the civil law system. It is sometimes said that the common law system, which originated in medieval England, is similar to the civil law system. Contrary to civil law, which takes the form of legal texts, common law systems historically obtained their rules from uncodified case law that arose from judicial decisions, treating earlier court decisions as binding precedent.

Know more about civil law- brainly.com/question/28156655

#SPJ4

Answer:

The person will have

1:a guilty conscience

2:the person will be rejected

Answer:

Its B and D

Explanation:

The term alternative dispute resolution (ADR) means any procedure, agreed to by the parties of a dispute, in which they use the services of a neutral party to assist them in reaching agreement and avoiding litigation. (litigation means legal action)

The stage of the policy process that entails getting an issue on the government's "to do list" is the agenda setting stage. This stage involves identifying and prioritizing issues that require government attention, which can be influenced by factors such as public opinion, political pressure, and external events.

Once an issue has been placed on the government's agenda, it can then move on to the next stages of the policy process, such as policy formulation, adoption, implementation, and evaluation.

Political allegiance or the kind of issue being debated might influence public policies. Public policy usually gets created by authorities in response to a problem and includes what the government will do to resolve the issue. A new law, a local bylaw, or a rule of the government can all be examples of public policy.

learn more about policy process here:

brainly.com/question/30563329

#SPJ11

According to Herman Goldstein, the proper role of politics in policing is allocating resources to ensure adequate problem-oriented policing followed by close monitoring of police activities.

Political influences should not have a place in policing a society. According to Goldstein, policing is itself an aberration in a free society. Adding politics to the activities of the police department will decrease society's freedom and individual liberty and complicate societal relationships.

In dealing with crime and law enforcement, police should be mindful of social and physical disorders and help the government curtail such occurrences. The improper role of politics in policing occurs when policing is used by politicians to subject opposition members to oppression or harassment.

Thus, the proper role of politics in policing is to ensure that there are adequate resources for policing, monitoring the outcome of policing in the society, and not intervening in policing based on political affiliations.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/22808563

Answer: it depends on what the drugs are for some people take drugs perscribed by their doctor to help them. some people need drugs for example people with ADHD take drugs to help them focus. if your sick you would be perscribed drugs to take. what you tlking about is people who take drugs to fell good. taking the wrong drugs can be bad for you and may cause an addiction. first they try it and it feels weird but after a few times of taking said drug they start to feel an addiction to it and have a strong need for the drug and later on they waste their money trying to get a hold of the drugs and the look lke garbage. They say its the good stuff because it may be a quality version of the drug of it make themselve feel good after taking it.

Explanation:

Answer:

Well I think that they are good people.  Unless you're talking about the ones who explode.

Explanation:

The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are

Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.

The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.

Read more about judge

https://brainly.com/question/1059156

#SPJ1

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.

The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.

To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562

#SPJ11

Answer:

I guess it depends on the goals of a university system.

If I am doing my math correctly, the set pass rate at my university when I started was around 29%. We were told that the bottom third would be flunked out each year. I do not remember the actual pass rate.

There is an advantage to that for university graduates, as a university degree now means more of an accomplihment, rather than that meaning somebody just hung around for four to six years.

There is a financial disadvantage to the college, in that those students who are being kicked out are no longer paying tuition and fees.

Explanation:

Answer:

If we scrap the 30% pass mark, our expectation of each Grade 12 learner is: Choose your NSC subjects wisely and get the best marks that you can in all your subjects. The higher your marks, the more opportunities for further study and work will open up for you. You can’t fail as there is no ‘pass mark’. Whatever marks you get, those marks are printed on your NSC certificate.

Hope it helped! :)

Answer:

true beacuse there always part of the mainstream

Answer: Answer: Answer:

Submit                              

The defense that may exist in this case is known as "misuse" or "contributory negligence."

This defense asserts that the plaintiff's own actions or failure to act, such as using the product in an unforeseeable or unreasonable manner, contributed to their injuries, and therefore the defendant should not be held fully responsible for the harm suffered by the plaintiff.

Under this defense, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff's misuse of the product was the cause of their injuries, rather than any defect in the product itself.

The defendant may also argue that the plaintiff failed to take reasonable precautions or use the product in a way that would have avoided the harm they suffered. If successful, the defense of misuse or contributory negligence may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability for the plaintiff's injuries.

However, the specific rules and standards for applying this defense can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances of the case.

To know more about contributory negligence here:

https://brainly.com/question/29829781

#SPJ4

Growth of new crime laboratory has as its goal for each lab to provide a clear and balanced analysis of both the submitted objects.

Crime is conduct that is seen to be deserving of punishment by statute or common law, whether it involves an act or an omission. Even though the majority of crimes need the requisite of intent, some small offenses might be committed under strict liability even though the defendant has no predetermined thoughts about committing the crime.

Felons, misdemeanors, inchoate offenses, etc strict liability offenses are the four main classifications of crimes. The federal government, together with each state, chooses which behaviors to make illegal.

To know more about crime visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9387575

#SPJ4

In this situation, it is possible that the homeowner could be held liable for the neighbor's injuries. This is because the homeowner took action by placing the ladder on the ice, which could be considered a negligent act.

Negligence occurs when someone fails to exercise reasonable care, causing harm to another person. If the neighbor can prove that the homeowner's actions directly led to their injuries, they may have a valid claim for damages.

However, it ultimately depends on the specific laws and circumstances of the jurisdiction where the incident occurred. It would be advisable for the neighbor to consult with a lawyer to determine their legal options.

Know more about  negligent act:

https://brainly.com/question/31454038

#SPJ11

Answer: The approach to foreign policy that involves sending ambassadors to other countries is Diplomacy

Explanation:

Answer:

Adapted Vehicles, & etc.

Explanation:

Drivers who have a physical disability may compensate for their disability in various ways, depending on the nature and severity of the disability. Some common methods of compensation include:

Answer:

Explanation:

Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:

Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.

Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.

Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.

Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.

Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.

Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.

Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.

The Robinson-Patman Act prohibits price discrimination in sales to wholesalers, retailers, or other producers.

The Robinson-Putman Act of 1936 (or Anti-Price Discrimination Act, Pub. L. No. 74-692, 49 Stat. 1526 prohibits anticompetitive conduct by manufacturers It is a U.S. federal law that , especially price discrimination. Senator Joseph T. It was designed by Rep. Robinson (D-Arkansas) and Rep. Wright Patman (D-Texas) to protect small retail businesses from competition from chain stores by setting minimum prices for retail products.

Specifically, the law Robinson-Putman Act prohibits suppliers, wholesalers, or manufacturers from supplying goods at discounted prices to "preferred customers." We also avoid forcing suppliers to limit who they can sell their products to and who they cannot sell to.

Learn more about Robinson-Patman Act https://brainly.com/question/15713233

#SPJ4

Answer:

ok don't worry, first i dont think youll go to jail and if you do its probably overnight unless you did something worse, then it'll be longer depending on what you did. But i doubt youll go to jail for one punch, maybe get yelled at but you'll be fine

Explanation:

Zviad Gamsakhurdia was dismissed from his presidency and subsequently faced accusations of dictatorial policies, the imprisonment of opposition leaders, and human rights abuses.

Zviad Gamsakhurdia, the first president of Georgia following its independence from the Soviet Union, faced a tumultuous tenure that ultimately led to his dismissal. After coming to power in 1991 with a mandate for democratic reforms, Gamsakhurdia's presidency was marked by increasing authoritarian tendencies, which resulted in widespread criticism and opposition.

Gamsakhurdia's presidency was characterized by the consolidation of power and a disregard for democratic principles. As his presidency progressed, he implemented policies that marginalized opposition voices and curtailed political freedoms. This included the imprisonment of opposition leaders, stifling of independent media, and suppression of dissenting views.

Furthermore, Gamsakhurdia's government was accused of human rights abuses during his time in power. Reports of torture, arbitrary arrests, and mistreatment of political opponents emerged, contributing to a climate of fear and repression. These allegations tarnished his reputation both domestically and internationally, leading to increased discontent among the Georgian population.

The accumulation of grievances against Gamsakhurdia's leadership eventually culminated in a popular uprising and his removal from office in early 1992. The events that followed further exposed the extent of his authoritarian rule and contributed to the overall negative perception of his presidency.

In conclusion, Zviad Gamsakhurdia's dismissal from the presidency and subsequent accusations of dictatorial policies, the imprisonment of opposition leaders, and human rights abuses reflect the erosion of democratic values and the abuse of power during his tenure. These events highlight the importance of upholding democratic principles, respecting human rights, and fostering an inclusive and transparent governance structure to ensure the well-being and stability of a nation.

Learn more about president

brainly.com/question/497462

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. Crime and Violence: South Africa has high levels of crime and violence, including homicides, assaults, and robberies. This poses a significant threat to the safety and well-being of individuals and communities. The prevalence of crime limits people's freedom to move around safely, impacts their mental and physical health, and undermines their ability to live in a secure environment.

2. Lack of access to basic services: Many communities in South Africa still face inadequate access to basic services such as clean water, sanitation, housing, and healthcare. This lack of access disproportionately affects marginalized populations, including those living in informal settlements and rural areas. The absence of these essential services hinders people's ability to live in a healthy and dignified manner, leading to increased health risks and poor living conditions.

3. Gender-based violence: Domestic violence, sexual assault, and femicide are all common forms of gender-based violence in South Africa. Women and girls are especially vulnerable to these transgressions, which have a significant impact on their safety, physical and emotional well-being, and overall quality of life. Gender-based violence persists because of underlying socioeconomic concerns and structural failings to defend human rights and provide gender equality.

Explanation:

Setting different ages to be considered legal adults would NOT constitute a prohibited case of gender classification as declared by the Supreme Court.

In general, gender-based discrimination is prohibited by the Constitution and various federal laws, and the Supreme Court has consistently ruled against gender-based discrimination in employment, education, and other areas. Barring women from police or firefighting jobs and drafting only men for military service have both been found to be unconstitutional forms of gender discrimination. However, setting different ages for legal adulthood is not inherently discriminatory based on gender and is instead based on factors such as maturity, responsibility, and societal expectations. As long as the age requirement is applied equally to men and women, it would not be considered a prohibited case of gender classification by the Supreme Court.

To know more about Supreme Court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29759733

#SPJ11

In the professional area, these are a few role conflicts that exist:

Job conflict happens when employees are given multiple, incompatible roles at once or when their role overlaps with that of another employee or workgroup. A worker is more likely to experience stress at work if there is more role conflict.

A role conflict typically arises when someone is pulled in several different ways as they attempt to respond to the numerous statuses they have. The most frequent role conflict is between a person's commitments at work and at home, or between professional and personal responsibilities.

Learn more about role conflict, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13603130

#SPJ1