the use of operating leverage by the firm has no direct impact on which of the following? (1) the risk associated with the firm's operations. (2) the risk experienced by the stockholders (3) the probability of going bankrupt (4) the variability of operating income (5) the variability of net income group of answer choices 2, 5 2, 3 2, 4 2, 3, 5 3, 5
Answers
Option 5. The use of operating leverage by a firm has no direct impact on the (5) variability of net income.
What is Operating leverage
Operating leverage refers to the degree to which a firm uses fixed costs in its operations, such as fixed production costs or fixed overhead expenses. When a company has a high degree of operating leverage, it means that a significant portion of its costs is fixed, which can amplify the effects of changes in sales or revenue on operating income.
While operating leverage can impact various aspects of a firm's financial performance, such as the risk associated with operations, the risk experienced by stockholders
Read more on Operating leverage here https://brainly.com/question/28500715
#SPJ1
Related Questions
when may an employer require an employee to submit to a lie detector test?
Answers
In general, under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA), employers are prohibited from requiring or even suggesting that employees submit to lie detector tests.
The law applies to most private employers, and it sets out strict guidelines for when and how lie detector tests can be administered. The law also prohibits employers from taking adverse actions against employees who refuse to take a lie detector test.
However, there are some exceptions to the EPPA. For example, some employers in the security and pharmaceutical industries may be exempt from the law, depending on their specific circumstances. Additionally, some government agencies may be allowed to use lie detector tests in certain situations, such as during investigations into security breaches or other sensitive matters.
It's important to note that even when an employer is legally allowed to require a lie detector test, the results of such a test may not always be admissible in court or other legal proceedings. Additionally, there are many factors that can affect the accuracy of lie detector tests, so their usefulness in determining the truth is often debated.
In conclusion, employers should always be cautious when considering the use of lie detector tests in the workplace, and they should consult with legal counsel to ensure that they are complying with all applicable laws and regulation.
To know more about lie detector test
https://brainly.com/question/30244626
#SPJ11
backspace backspace backspace
Answers
Answer:
backspace
Explanation:
delete
Answer:
When u wanna delete something
Explanation:
Have a Nice Day
Explain the significance of the Jon Benet Ramsey case in regards to its’ impact on current law enforcement protocol.
Answers
The significance of the Jon Benet Ramsey case with the impact on law enforcement protocol is that it helped to establish the protocol that would be used in securing a crime scene so as not to have it contaminated by other people.
What was the Jon Bennet Ramsey case?This was the homicide case of the lady named JonBennet that had been killed in what the law enforcement agents ruled as homicide. The cause of death that she had was from the fact that she was strangled and suffered from asphyxiation due to the act.
The issue that resulted was that her father contaminated the scene of the crime when he went to get hold of the victims body thereby making it difficult to get the suspect that committed the murder.
The major lesson that was learnt from this was the need to always secure the crime scene first and block people from having the entrance to such areas.
Read more on law enforcement protocol here: https://brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ1
The Smith System is __________
A. a system of safe driving.
B. a car maintenance system.
C. a plan of healthy eating.
D. a work out program.
Answers
Answer:
the answer is a) a system of safe driving
vận dụng cặp phạm trù nguyên nhân và kết quả trong giả quyết tai nạn giao thông
Answers
Answer:
srryy i have know Idea im here for points
Job is convinced that if he could only have the opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judging the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent.
true/false
Answers
The given statement, "Job is convinced that if he could be given opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judged the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent," is True.
God believes Job is humble and devout. Satan, however, challenges God, saying that Job is virtuous and moral only because God blessed him with good fortune.
Satan bets God that if Job experiences suffering, his devotion will falter, and he will curse God. However, after a series of disasters strike Job, he still does not curse God. But when he is struck with a horrible skin disease. Three of Job's friends arrive to comfort him, and Job finally questions the injustice done to him.
His friends entice him to challenge God's will. They suggest that his misfortune is probably a result of some sin he committed. Job replies that, 'he is innocent and pleads for a fair hearing from God.'
For more details on the Book of Job, visit: https://brainly.com/question/20379041
#SPJ11
Very specific and detailed rules that govern a large range of activities that could impact the natural environment, such as specific standards for construction of landfill sites, would be found in which of the following (from the command toolbox)?
Select one:
a. Environmental approvals
b. Policies and guidelines
c. Regulations
d. Administrative orders
Answers
comprehensive laws are frequently where one may find that control a variety of a the precise and Regulations are frequently that control a variety of actions that have an influence on the environment, such as requirements for building landfill sites.
Regulations are a type of legislation that has been specifically created to solve environmental issues and guarantee adherence to environmental protection measures. They are legally binding. They offer detailed instructions that must be followed in order to reduce harmful effects on the environment. By offering additional guidance and administrative procedures, environmental approvals, policies, and guidelines, as well as administrative orders, may be used to supplement regulations. However, it is the regulations themselves that contain the specific and detailed rules that govern activities affecting the natural environment.
Learn more about comprehensive laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/32522168
#SPJ11
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise
Answers
The term for awarding political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is called patronage.
Patronage is the distribution of government positions, contracts, and other benefits to individuals based on their political support rather than their qualifications or merit.
Patronage is the act of giving jobs, contracts, and other benefits to supporters and friends of a political party or individual rather than considering their qualifications or merit. It's a form of corruption that has long been associated with politics.
Patronage is frequently used to reward political allies, supporters, and campaign donors with jobs, contracts, and other perks. As a result, patronage is often viewed as a way to gain and maintain political power, which can lead to inefficiency and waste in government.
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is?
Learn more about political https://brainly.com/question/29979765
#SPJ11
Many reform movements sprang up in the 1800s. Which eventually resulted in women's right to vote?.
Answers
Many reform movements sprang up in the 1800s, and eventually, it resulted in women's right to vote. The Women's Rights Movement was an American civil rights movement that began in the mid-nineteenth century and lasted until 1920 when the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified, granting women the right to vote.
The campaign for women's rights in the United States was at its peak in the late 19th century and early 20th century. The women's rights movement emerged from the women's suffrage movement, which was a movement that sought to grant women the right to vote. Women were inspired by the abolition movement to seek greater political and legal rights and used its strategies to advance their own cause.The Seneca Falls Convention was the first women's rights convention held in the United States, and it was held in Seneca Falls, New York, on July 19-20, 1848. The convention was organized by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and others, and it was attended by more than 300 people. It was at this convention that the Declaration of Sentiments, which called for women's suffrage and other women's rights, was signed.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the women's suffrage movement gained momentum, and women became more involved in political activism. They organized marches, rallies, and other events to raise awareness of women's issues. The movement also had the support of many men, who saw women's rights as an important social issue.In 1920, the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified, granting women the right to vote. This was a significant milestone in the women's rights movement, but it was only the beginning of a long struggle for gender equality in the United States. Women continued to fight for equal rights in the workplace, education, and other areas, and the women's rights movement continues to this day.
To know more about right to vote visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29759734
#SPJ11
What important rule was introduced in 1954 to speed up the tempo of the game?
Answers
Answer:
the clara clarckston rule
Explanation:
Answer:
Then in 1954, the 24-second shot clock was introduced. This was done to increase the speed of the game, by forcing the team with the basketball to shoot the ball before the 24-second timer is up. Finally, the NBA introduced the three-point line, in the 1979-1980 season.
In Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that: O a. Section 33.1 of the Criminal Code should be declared unconstitutional and of no force or effect pursuant to s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. O b. S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 12 of the Charter. O c. S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Charter but that the infringements were justified under s. 1 of the Charter. O d. The judgement of the Court of Appeal should be upheld.
Answers
The Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18 concluded that S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 12 of the Charter. However, the infringements were justified under s. 1 of the Charter. Therefore, option C is correct.
Section 33.1 of the Criminal CodeThe "not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder" (NCRMD) provision, also known as section 16 of the Criminal Code, has been the topic of much controversy over the years. In its 1999 decision in R. v. Swain, the Supreme Court of Canada declared section 16 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional, and
Parliament subsequently re-enacted the provision, along with a new provision, section 33.1, in 2005.Section 33.1 of the Criminal Code provides a mechanism for detention, examination, and release from detention for people found NCRMD, as well as for those found unfit to stand trial.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 12 of the Charter but that the infringements were justified under s. 1 of the Charter.
Learn more about Criminal Code visit : brainly.com/question/32420090
#SPJ11
A nurse slips and falls at the hospital while caring
for a patient. Which organization would the nurse
contact to complain about poor worker safety
conditions at the hospital?
Answers
Answer:
osha
Explanation:
What law that banned child labor and created a federal minimum wage?
Answers
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 law banned child labor and created a federal minimum wage.
In 1938, the FLSA, or Fair Labor Standards Act, was enacted. It is a federal law that was passed to safeguard employees from mistreatment that was taking place during the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression. Businesses would frequently pay employees low wages and require them to work long hours during this time. Although many people, particularly recent immigrants, considered the working conditions to be oppressive, they felt compelled to accept the jobs in order to support their families.
A living wage was established by the FLSA for employees. This is the federally mandated minimum wage that must be paid to employees for each hour of work. This indicates that employers must pay employees at least this specific, regulated amount per hour by law. The minimum wage was just $0.25 an hour when the FLSA was passed in 1938.
Learn more about Fair Labor Standards Act at:
brainly.com/question/16858218
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a condition of probation that can be reviewed by appellate courts? a. Restricting a child's movement b. Voluntary treatment programs c. School attendance d. Drug court attendance
Answers
None of the above.is a condition of probation that can be reviewed by appellate courts
Appellate courts generally review legal errors or issues of law, not conditions of probation that are within the discretion of the trial court. Conditions of probation are often imposed by the trial court as part of a sentence, and may include requirements such as drug testing, community service, or electronic monitoring. While an appellate court may review whether the conditions of probation are lawful, such as whether they exceed the statutory authority of the trial court or violate the defendant's constitutional rights, they typically will not review whether the conditions are appropriate or effective
Learn more about Appellate courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/13944421
#SPJ11
How did the draft laws in the north and south differ.
Answers
Answer: The South required all men 18-45 to enlist with few expectations. The North offered a bounty of $300 which led more volunteers
Explanation:
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
Answers
The utilitarian approach to moral reasoning focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being by considering the costs and benefits of actions. It weighs the consequences of actions and aims to achieve the greatest net benefit for the greatest number of people.
In business ethics, while the utilitarian approach can be applied, it is not always the most common approach. This is because it may require weighing the costs and benefits of actions in a way that can be challenging or subjective, especially when considering factors such as individual rights, justice, and other moral values.
Other approaches, such as deontological ethics or virtue ethics, may also be employed in business ethics depending on the specific circumstances and values involved.
why should the public have access to the technical records
Answers
Answer:
Because I feel we should be able to know what's going on but my opinion doesn't matter i learned that in college debate
Explanation:
Under the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, the president can ask for a(n) ___________ to prevent a strike in a critical industry.
Selected Answer:
temporary take over by the federal government
Response Feedback:
incorrectcooling off
Answers
The Taft-Hartley Act allows the President to appoint a board to investigate union disputes if he deems that a strike would endanger national health or safety.
Taft-Hartley Act's goal was to establish a more balanced relationship between labour and management. The Taft-Hartley Act was intended to defuse the growing momentum of the organised labour movement. According to its terms, the President may issue an executive order requiring the reopening of any union-shuttered workplace, with criminal penalties applied to those who refuse. The act specified that in order to unionise a workplace, a majority of employees must vote in favour of doing so. The Taft-Hartley Act also restricted employers' responsibility when on-site supervisors and workplace managers violate workers' legal rights. This provision provides that if a management official participates in conduct that may be construed as harassment of union members for purposes other than the performance of his or her real work duties, the employer shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability.
Learn more about penalties here:
https://brainly.com/question/30029167
#SPJ4
Objects that affected eachother. (Newtons law)
Answers
This is often worded as 'every action has an equal and opposite reaction'. However, it is important to remember that the two forces:
act on two different objects
are of the same type (eg both contact forces)
Name and discuss two types of normative system
Answers
Two types of normative systems are moral systems, which focus on ethics and values, and legal systems, which enforce laws and regulations.
Normative systems dictate appropriate behavior within societies and include both moral and legal systems. Moral systems are centered on ethics and values, guiding individuals to differentiate between right and wrong based on cultural, religious, or philosophical principles.
These systems impact interpersonal relationships, group dynamics, and individual choices. Legal systems, on the other hand, establish and enforce laws and regulations set by governing bodies.
These systems provide rules for acceptable conduct, outlining consequences for violations.
Legal systems help maintain social order and stability, whereas moral systems shape personal behavior and influence societal values.
For more such questions on laws, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ11
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answers
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
Describe in depth the ways a principal-agent relationship can end.
Answers
Answer:
Similarly, the relationship between agent and principal comes to an end when principal or agent becomes insane, for a person of unsound mind cannot contract. 4. Insolvency of the Principal: When the principal is declared as insolvent, the agency is terminated.
Explanation:
Answer:
An agent’s authority can be terminated at any time. If the trust between the agent and the principal has broken down, it is not reasonable to allow the principal to remain at risk in any transactions that the agent might conclude during a period of notice.
Explanation:
Dose this answer it?
Brainliest please
the coast guard is prohibited by law (titles 10 and 14) from performing military and law enforcement services simultaneously. true or false?
Answers
The statement "the coast guard is prohibited by law (titles 10 and 14) from performing military and law enforcement services simultaneously." is false as Coast Guard is authorized to perform both military and law enforcement services .
The Coast Guard is qualified to carry out simultaneous military and law enforcement duties. The Coast Guard has two distinct roles and responsibilities as both a federal law enforcement organization and a branch of the US armed forces. It is in charge of a number of tasks including environmental protection, search and rescue efforts, drug interdiction and maritime security.
When there is no war the Coast Guard can be transferred to the Department of Defense at the President's request or under the control of the Department of Homeland Security. Therefore the Coast Guard is free to carry out both military and law enforcement duties simultaneously without breaking any laws.
Learn more about Coast Guard at:
brainly.com/question/30388740
#SPJ4
ince the late 1980s, the courts in texas have become more favorable to defendants in civil cases than to plaintiffs. why?
Answers
In general, more conservative than liberal justices have been elected.
The general public instances heard are from a petition for review. The highest appellate courtroom for criminal matters inside the country of Texas. The nine participants of this crook court docket are elected for 6-yr terms.
Famously, one case that become appealed three times become heard by means of three distinctive intermediate appellate courts in Texas. Another uncommon factor of Texas's appellate courtroom machine is the allocation of justices in election cycles. Every one of the 80 justices on those courts needs to stand for election every six years.
Learn more about liberal justices here https://brainly.com/question/14455326
#SPJ4
An attorney negligently gives erroneous “curbstone advice” to his client. Can he be held liable for mis-representation? Buttersworth v. Swint, 186 S.E. 77 (Va. 1936)
Answers
In the case of Buttersworth v. Swint, 186 S.E. 77 (Va. 1936), the specific details and facts of the case are necessary to provide a comprehensive analysis. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the attorney in question may potentially be held liable for misrepresentation if certain conditions are met.
To determine liability for misrepresentation, several factors are typically considered, such as the attorney-client relationship, the nature of the advice given, and the consequences of relying on that advice. Additionally, the specific laws and regulations governing legal ethics in the jurisdiction where the case occurred would play a role in assessing liability.
in what way can victims of crime be better assisted and empowered in the criminal justice system?
Answers
Answer:
By having strong evidences mostly regarding his case or/and witnesses of course
Explanation:
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
Answers
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
Should there be an obligation to recognize same sex marriage entered into in another state which that is lawful even if the state itself constitutionally does not recognize Sam sex marriage
Answers
first,it's forbidden by religions
What type of intent is necessary to violate the provisions of the Deadly Weapons Control Law?
Answers
Attempt robbery or dacoity while armed with a lethal we-apon.— If the criminal is armed with a dangerous we-apon while attempting to commit robbery... dacoity, the imprisonment with which such offender must be sentenced shall Law.
Central Government Law committing grave harm voluntarily utilizing dangerous we-apon or ways —Whoever, except as provided in section 335, voluntarily causes grievous harm by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing, or cutting, or any instrument which, when used as a we=apon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or corrosive substance.
To learn more about Law, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
Is Carry a firearm a civil right or civil liberty