Answer:
A. B
Explanation:
The image has been attached.
Reflected ray refers to the ray of light which is reflected back after striking a surface that is non-permeable.
The ray of light which is reflected before the ray touches the surface is said to the incident ray.
According to the given image, ray B is the reflected ray. Ray B is reflected in the air after the ray A strikes at the surface of the water.
B
Explanation:
Since mirrors reflect things, when you shine light at a mirror, it will bounce off of the mirror, or reflect, and shine the opposite direction of where the original light is pointed. The answer would be B because light doesn't go through the mirror, or run along it.
Think of when you through a basketball on the ground. If you bounce it at an angle, it won't just come back to you in the same angle. It will keep bouncing at the same angle you through it. This is pretty much what describes the relationship between ray A and ray B.
HOPE THIS HELPS!!!!!
How was Thomson's model of the atom valuable, even though Rutherford's experiment showed that the model was wrong?
Thomson's model of the atom was eventually proven incorrect by Rutherford's experiment, but it was still valuable as it challenged the prevailing ideas about atoms and helped to lay the groundwork for further research in the field
J.J. Thomson's atomic model, also known as the "plum pudding model " was proposed in 1904. It suggested that atoms were made up of a positively charged mass with negatively charged electrons embedded in it, resembling plums in a pudding. While this model was eventually proven incorrect it was still valuable for several reasons
Firstly, Thomson's model was significant because it was the first atomic model that included electrons. At the time, it was believed that atoms were indivisible and unchangeable. Thomson's model challenged this notion by proposing the existence of negatively charged particles, which eventually led to the discovery of electron.
Secondly, Thomson's model helped to explain the behavior of cathode rays which were streams of electrons observed in vacuum tubes. He found that the cathode rays were attracted to a positively charged plate and repelled by a negatively charged plate, suggesting that they were negatively charged particles.
To know more about Thomson's model refer to this link
https://brainly.in/question/5929174
PLEASE HELP
Highlight the objects or materials items that are made of cells and did originate from cells.
Answer:
ur mom
Explanation:
Answer: flowers chromomes cell membranes clorophyl
Explanation: cells are the building blocks of life and flowers contain cells for different things like we contain cells for mitosis I am strongly sure about flowers but the rest maybe wrong hope this helped!
list both types of energy before skydiver jumps out of the plane and as the sky diver is diving.
Answer : This is an example of Kenitic and potential energy
Explanation:
kenitic: the act of moving or motion
potential: not. moving YET
he was not moving when he was on the plane and had potential energy cause he wasn't getting pulled down and kenitic energy was when he was getting pulled down from force of gravity when he was getting pulled to the ground when he was skydiving
A driver is driving a 6371 kg lorry. After spotting a hazard, the driver applies the brakes. The lorry decelerates uniformly and comes to a stop 60 m after the brakes are applied. Estimate the braking force needed to stop the lorry.
Answer:
The estimated braking force needed to stop the lorry is zero, based on the given information and calculations. However, it's important to note that this result is likely not accurate, as some force is required to stop a moving object. It's possible that additional information or calculations are needed to obtain a more realistic estimate of the braking force.
Explanation:
To estimate the braking force needed to stop the lorry, we can use Newton's second law of motion, which states that force (F) is equal to mass (m) multiplied by acceleration (a).
In this case, the lorry decelerates uniformly, so the acceleration is constant. The initial velocity is assumed to be zero since the lorry comes to a stop. The final velocity is also zero. Therefore, we can use the equation:
Final velocity squared (vf^2) = Initial velocity squared (vi^2) + 2 * acceleration (a) * distance (d)
Since vi = 0 and vf = 0, the equation simplifies to:
0 = 0 + 2 * a * d
Solving for acceleration (a), we have:
2 * a * d = 0
a = 0
Since the acceleration is zero, it means that the braking force needed to stop the lorry is also zero. This is likely not an accurate result as some force is required to stop the lorry. It's possible that additional information or calculations are needed to accurately estimate the braking force.
The braking force required to stop a 6371 kg lorry after spotting a hazard and applying the brakes is what the question is asking for. The lorry decelerates uniformly and comes to a stop 60 meters after the brakes are applied.
The following steps will guide you on how to calculate the braking force:
Step 1: Determine the mass of the lorry which is 6371 kg. This will be denoted as m.
Step 2: Determine the distance travelled by the lorry, which is 60 m.
Step 3: Determine the time taken by the lorry to stop. This can be done by using the formula for uniform deceleration, which is a = (v-u)/t where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity and a is the uniform deceleration. Since the lorry comes to a stop, its final velocity is zero and its initial velocity is unknown.
However, we can assume that the lorry was initially travelling at a constant speed before spotting the hazard. Therefore, we can assume that the initial velocity was equal to the average velocity of the lorry before the brakes were applied.
This can be calculated using the formula v = d/t where d is the distance travelled and t is the time taken. The average velocity can therefore be calculated as follows: v = d/t = 60 m/t
Step 4: Rearrange the formula for uniform deceleration, a = (v-u)/t, to find u which is the initial velocity. Since the lorry comes to a stop, we know that v = 0.
Therefore: u = v - at where a is the uniform deceleration and t is the time taken to stop which is also equal to the time taken for the lorry to travel the distance of 60 meters. Substituting for v, we get: u = - at
Step 5: Calculate the acceleration of the lorry using the formula a = (v-u)/t. Since the final velocity is zero, we get: a = -u/t = -(-at)/t = a The acceleration is negative since the lorry is decelerating.
Step 6: Calculate the braking force using the formula F = ma where F is the braking force and m is the mass of the lorry. Therefore: F = ma = (-ma) since a is negative = (-6371 kg) (a) Therefore, the braking force required to stop the lorry is -6371a N where a is the uniform deceleration calculated in Step 5.
For more such questions on lorry decelerates
https://brainly.com/question/16964101
#SPJ8
When you drop something, first of all it accelerates.
The faster it falls, the bigger the force of ______ that acts on it.
choose from the list to complete the sentence:
friction gravity air pressure
note: apparently the answer is friction but it doesn't make sense to me so please explain.
The faster an object is going, the more resistance there will be. An example of this would be if you're running the faster you run, the more air is going against you.
I hope this helps!
SCIENCE QUESTION!!!
It's easy. I'm just not that smart lol.
Answer:
light and heat is the answer
What does it mean when something asks to put a proposed hypothesis?
help please :((
////
/
Answer:
c)
Explanation:
b) and d) are incorrect because there is only one wave, but there are two fields.
a) is incorrect because the electric field and magnetic field are not parallel, they are perpendicular, or 90 degrees to one another, so this means:
c) is correct.
1 sentence telling me the topic of the story. In your own words.
3 sentences you copy straight from the magazine with "quotation" marks around it. This sentence proves that the topic is what you stated in the first sentence.
1 sentence telling me the conclusion. In your own words.
3 sentences you copy straight from the magazine with "quotation" marks around it. This sentence proves that the conclusion is what you stated in the sentence above this one
The average woodpecker smashes its beak against a hard surface more than 10,000 times a day. Any human who jolted their head like this would likely end up with a concussion. This traumatic brain injury is caused by a blow to the skull. So why doesn’t the constant hammering turn woodpeckers’ brains into mush? For years, it was assumed that woodpeckers had some kind of cushioning in their heads to protect their brains during pecking. Many scientists suggested that spongy bone in the birds’ skulls absorbed and lessened the shock of each impact (see Myth Buster: Hard Headed). This idea was repeated in scientific articles, textbooks, and informative plaques at zoos. Even though the concept “is often presented like a clear-cut fact, there haven’t been any real tests to prove it,” says Sam Van Wassenbergh. He’s a biologist who studies biomechanics, or how living things move, at the University of Antwerp in Belgium.SHOCK ABSORBER: Van Wassenbergh uses a spring-loaded hammer to show why a shock-absorbing skull would make a woodpecker less efficient at pecking. When you think about it, says Van Wassenbergh, the shock-absorbing skull idea doesn’t make much sense. Woodpecker drills into the wood in search of insects to eat. When the bird’s head accelerates forward, the movement generates kinetic energy. This energy of motion is transferred to the tree when the bird slams its beak against the trunk. If a woodpecker’s skull had to cushion, it would absorb some of this energy and decrease the force of the peck. Why would a bird that survives by pecking evolve to do it less effectively? Van Wassenbergh and his team decided to see what was really going on. First, the researchers recorded videos of woodpeckers’ heads in motion. To capture this rapid movement, the scientists needed special high-speed cameras. Each peck lasts only a fraction of a second! Van Wassenbergh’s team recorded videos of six woodpeckers from three species and analyzed the footage. The researchers used a computer to track three points on each bird’s head: one on the skull and two on the beak. The scientists hypothesized that if the birds’ skulls had shock absorbers, the footage would show a “squishing” of the space between the skull and beak—like when a spring compresses. But that didn’t happen. Instead, the birds’ heads moved as one stiff unit, like a hammer. Next, the team wanted to demonstrate why this adaptation would be helpful to the birds. Using computer models, the scientists simulated woodpecker skulls with and without shock absorbers. Then the researchers compared the force of the pecks. “The pecking performance was greatly reduced in the skull with a shock absorber,” says Maja Mielke, a biologist who worked on the study. With shock absorbers, says Mielke, “the poor birds would need to pound even harder to reach the same results.” For a woodpecker, having a shock-absorbing skull would simply be a waste of energy. Science World originally published this diagram in our May 10, 2021, issue. It was based on scientists’ beliefs about woodpecker anatomy at the time. Here it is again—updated based on new research. MYTH: The skull is made of spongy bone that cushions and protects the brain from impactBUSTED! The skull is hard enough to protect the bird from injury, but it doesn’t cushion The eyes have a special membrane that protects them from flying splinters and wood dust.MYTH: Neck muscles are strong and stiff enough to absorb the shock of each peck BUSTED! Stiff neck muscles do not absorb shock—in fact, they help increase the force of each peck.MYTH: The tongue wraps completely around the outside of the skull, providing an additional level of cushioning, and can extend to probe for food inside holes made by the birdBUSTED! The tongue does not provide any observable cushioning. The beak is connected to the skull with thick bone that prevents jolts and vibrations. NEW RESEARCH SHOWS: The woodpecker’s brain is small, which helps prevent concussions that might occur in a larger animal. If woodpeckers’ skulls don’t absorb shock, then why doesn’t constant pecking damage the birds’ brains? To answer this question, the researchers calculated how harmful the blows from pecking actually are. It turns out the hits aren’t that dangerous because the birds’ brains are so small. “Small masses can tolerate stronger impact forces without being damaged,” says Mielke.
Answer:
The topic of the story is about how woodpeckers can peck without causing damage to their brains.
"The average woodpecker smashes its beak against a hard surface more than 10,000 times a day."
"This traumatic brain injury is caused by a blow to the skull."
"So why doesn’t the constant hammering turn woodpeckers’ brains into mush?"
The conclusion of the story is that woodpeckers don't get brain damage from pecking because their brains are small, which allows them to handle the force of the pecks.
"Small masses can tolerate stronger impact forces without being damaged,"
"The hits aren’t that dangerous because the birds’ brains are so small."
"To answer this question, the researchers calculated how harmful the blows from pecking actually are."
Explanation:
Explain what happens as the heart grows bigger.
Write a paragraph explaining in your own words how this observation provides evidence to support the big bang theory.
Answer:
The image showcases density fluctuation signal when the CMB scattered, nearly 380,000 years ago. This can only occur after an event theorized and more commonly known as the Big Bang. The Big Bang is how the universe got created from one finite point with everlasting expansion. Now this image directly correlates way below the point of super-horizon, but nevertheless, still shows fluctations moving less than the speed of light.
Explanation:
I got the answer from forbes. Then just wrote a paragraph. However, you did not specify the length so I did 5 sentences. If needed be the question show of stated more in length.
Explain the difference between trace fossils and body fossils. Provide examples of each type.
Answer:
trace fossils are evidence of biological activity, such as worm trails, footprints, or animal tracks
body fossils are the remains of an organism such as teeth, bones, and shells
Explanation:
Wind turbines have large rotating arms. These arms rotate with the wind, and the turbine uses this motion to generate electricity.
What happens to the wind when it is powering a turbine?
A. The wind is not affected by the turbine.
B. The wind speeds up.
C. The wind slows down.
D. The wind may, or may not, be affected by the turbine.
The smallest particle in the universe?
A grain of salt is small, but you can always make it smaller. Imagine cutting that grain of salt into two pieces. Now cut it again and again. Soon, you can't see the smaller pieces with your eyes, but the salt is still there. You finally cut the salt down to the very tiniest piece of salt there is. But even that tiny piece contains smaller particles. Those tiny particles are atoms. Atoms make up everything in the visible universe from galaxies to even yourself. Atoms are so incredibly small that you could line up 50 million in a row and the line would only be about 1 centimeter (less than half an inch) long. Still, scientists have found things that are smaller than atoms. And they are looking for more. If they find the smallest things in the universe, they'll better understand how the universe actually works. But it took some time before people discovered the world of the truly small. The Universe Gets Smaller… Grains of sand or dust were once the smallest things actually seen on Earth. By the 1600s, several inventions opened up brand new worlds to curious minds. These included lenses that could make things look clearer and bigger. Another early invention was the microscope. Some people used the microscope to observe and write about the tiniest things they could see. In the 1670s, a Dutch lens maker named Antonie van Leeuwenhoek built himself a microscope. It magnified things more than 200 times. Van Leeuwenhoek discovered a world of tiny living things that he called tiny animals. Van Leeuwenhoek figured they were about 1/38th the size of a grain of sand. Today we know that what he saw were bacteria, the smallest living things on Earth. But atoms are much, much smaller. You can't see atoms with an ordinary microscope.
…And Smaller The idea that tiny, unbreakable particles make up everything that exists is more than 2000 years old. The Greek thinker Democritus called these particles "atomos." This is the Greek word for "uncuttable." Scientists didn't return to the idea of atoms until the 1800s. At first, scientists thought atoms were tiny balls with some electrical charges inside. They also thought atoms were the smallest particles that existed. But scientists soon began to wonder if atoms might be made of smaller things. In 1897, British scientist J. J. Thomson proved that they were. He ran experiments and discovered the electron. This tiny particle has a negative electrical charge and whizzes around inside the atom. A graphic showing the basic atomic structure of three elements, hydrogen, helium and oxygen. Protons, neutrons and electrons are shown.Zoom-in Different elements have different numbers of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The Smallest Things—So Far Scientists were soon discovering more inside the atom. Hiding in the atom's center is the tiny nucleus. (If an atom were the size of a racetrack, the nucleus would be about the size of a pea in the middle.) The nucleus contains two types of particles: protons and neutrons. Protons have a positive electrical charge while neutrons have no charge. They contain even tinier particles called quarks that are so unimaginably small that they have no internal structure. Quarks and electrons are the smallest particles found so far. Scientists call the smallest things they've found fundamental particles. Fundamental particles do not contain any smaller particles. Scientists use huge machines called particle accelerators to learn more about particles. These machines speed up particles so they can smash into each other. Then the scientists track the paths the particles leave when they hit. Scientists use accelerators to discover new particles. Many scientists wonder why there are so many particles at all. Shouldn't there be just one "smallest thing" instead of many? The search goes on for the particle that is the one true building block of everything in the universe
Which sentence from the article helps the reader to understand that the nucleus of an atom is very small?
A Still, scientists have found things that are smaller than atoms
B The idea that tiny, unbreakable particles make up everything that exists is more than 2,000 years old
C Hiding in the atom's center is the tiny nucleus
D (If an atom were the size of a racetrack, the nucleus would be about the size of a pea in the middle.)
Read the paragraph below from the section "... And Smaller."
But scientists soon began to wonder if atoms might be made of smaller things. In 1897, British scientist J. J. Thomson proved that they were. He ran experiments and discovered the electron. This tiny particle has a negative electrical charge and whizzes around inside the atom
What inference can the reader make based on this paragraph?
A Electrons are the made up of even smaller particles
B Other scientists had questions about Thomson’s experiments
C Thomson could not see electrons but found signs they existed
D Thomson discovered electrons while looking through a microscope
Answer:
breh
Explanation:
Science question! Whoever answers first and correct gets brainliest!
Answer:
I believe the answer is D
Explanation:
Answer:
d
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ME
If we did use zero-friction machines for these purposes, how would our everyday lives change?
What is a Box Camera
A box camera is a simple type of camera, the most common form being a cardboard or plastic box with a lens in one end and film at the other. They were sold in large numbers during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The lenses are often single element designs meniscus fixed focus lens, or in better quality box cameras a doublet lens with minimal (if any) possible adjustments to the aperture or shutter speeds. Because of the inability to adjust focus, the small lens aperture and the low sensitivity of the sensitive materials available, these cameras work best in brightly lit day-lit scenes when the subject is within the hyperfocal distance for the lens and of subjects that move little during the exposure. Eventually, box cameras with photographic flash, shutter and aperture adjustment were introduced, allowing indoor photos.
Learn more about Pinhole Cameras
Visit —
1) Advantages of Pinhole Cameras https://brainly.in/question/2724158
2) Is working of camera is similar to that of pin hole camera?brainly.in/question/14388967?referrer=searchResults
3) Uses of pin hole camera?
brainly.in/question/596597?referrer=searchResults
Hope my answer helps you ✌️
Mark BRAINLIEST
#SPJ3
Answer:
a simple box-shaped hand camera, typically lacking an adjustment for shutter speed.
What two gases in the atmosphere do animals and plants need to breathe and grow?
Answer: Explanation:
Plants and animals each produce the gases that the other needs to live. Plants need carbon dioxide—people and other animals exhale carbon dioxide as a waste product. People and other animals need oxygen—plants produce oxygen during an important process called photosynthesis, which turns the sun's energy into nutrients.
How might the Turkish government BEST increase its GDP?
A Send scientists to search for deposits of oil.
B Import cheaper goods from Turkey’s neighbors.
C Invest in programs to help Turkey’s citizens learn new job skills.
D Promote Turkey as a desirable place for skilled western workers to emigrate.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It would be C because Turkey would like its citizens to learn new job skills and because of this the effect would be a higher GDP
You are out and about in the country and your father sees a rock that he really wants in the yard. Now you must get the very heavy rock into the back of a truck. The truck bed is 3 feet off the ground. Your father pulls out a 5-foot plank and begins to set up a ramp. At the same time, you (who know about mechanical advantage!) have found a plank that is 8 feet long, and you show it to your father.
Which plank will give you the most mechanical advantage? Calculate the MA for each plank.
Plank that is 8 feet long will give more mechanical advantage than 5-foot plank .
What is mechanical advantage?The force amplified by utilizing a tool, mechanical device, or machine system is known as mechanical advantage.
mechanical advantage of a ramp = the length of the slope/ the height of the ramp.
Height = 3 feet ( fixed).
Hence, plank that is 8 feet long will give more mechanical advantage than 5-foot plank because the length of the slope is greater in the case of plank that is 8 feet long.
Learn more about mechanical advantage here:
https://brainly.com/question/16617083
#SPJ1
Answer is 8 ft so that it is easier to move
part two of my other my questions
4. The Himalayan Mountains tower as high as 8,854 m above sea level. The rate of plate motion is about 10 cm per year. Use the diagram to explain how the Himalayas formed. Predict how they might look in 10 million years.
Answer:
Forty million years ago, the continent of India, which was being carried northward by the Indo-Australian plate, collided with Asia forming the Himalayan mountain range (fold mountains). Since the initial encounter, the subcontinent of India has moved 2,000 kilometers farther north at a rate of 5 centimeters a year, sliding beneath Asia as it moves. In 10 million years India will plow into Tibet a further 180km. This is about the width of Nepal.
Answer:Since the initial encounter, the subcontinent of India has moved 2,000 kilometers farther north at a rate of 5 centimeters a year, sliding beneath Asia as it moves. In 10 million years India will plow into Tibet a further 180km. This is about the width of Nepal.
pleeaseeee helllp A geologist finds a large rock containing a fern fossil. This kind of fern grew on land in hot, moist climates.
What does this tell the geologist about the area at the time the rock was formed?
The area was covered by an ocean.
The area was muddy and wet.
The area was hot and tropical.
The area was snowy and cold.
Answer: The area was hot and tropical.
Explanation:
Answer these questions please
Answer:
1. DEclanation, you can see that location makes a great deal of difference in where the compass points. The angular difference between true north and magnetic north is known as the declination.
2. The Earth's magnetic North Pole is not the same as "true north," or the Earth's geographic North Pole .
3. a change or difference in condition, amount, or level, typically with certain limits.
4. a. It helps them find their way north.
b. They would get lost.
5. a.An orienteering map is a map specially prepared for use in orienteering events. These maps are much more detailed than general-purpose topographic maps, and incorporate a standard symbology that is designed to be useful to anyone, regardless of native language.
b.
The reason for this choice is that orienteers use a magnetic compass to navigate with, so it makes sense for both map and compass to be utilising the same system.
Explanation:
Any other Gypresgions come from shakespeare and are they used today?
Answer:Both books find Shakespeare deeply Catholic, but they reach very different conclusions about what that meant in his life and work during a time of official Protestantism, the Jesuit mission to England, and sharp divisions among Anglicans, Puritans, and Catholics.
Explanation:
Calculate the change in the kinetic energy (KE) of the bottle when the mass is increased. Use the formula
KE = one half.mv2, where m is the mass and v is the speed (velocity). Assume that the speed of the soda bottle falling from a height of
0.8 m will be 4 m/s, and use this speed for each calculation.
Record your calculations in Table A of your Student Guide.
When the mass of the bottle is 0.125 kg, the KE is
kg m2/s2.
When the mass of the bottle is 0.250 kg, the KE is
kg m2/s2.
When the mass of the bottle is 0.375 kg, the KE is
kg m2/s2.
When the mass of the bottle is 0.500 kg, the KE is
kg m2/s2.
Answer:
The answers are the options 1, 2, 3, and 4
Explanation:
If you have any questions ask me please! :)
The kinetic Energy of the bottle falling from a height of 0.8m for different masses of (0.125,0.250,0.375,0.500)kg is (1,2,3,4) kgm*2/s*2 respectively.
Let's calculate the kinetic energy for different masses having a velocity of 4m/s in each case,
Using Formula:
K.E=\(1/2mv^{2}\)
When the mass of the bottle is 0.125 kg, the Kinetic Energy is
K.E=\(1/2(0.125)(4)^{2}\)
K.E=\(1/2(0.125)(16)\)
K.E=1/2(2)
K.E=1
When the mass of the bottle is 0.250 kg, the Kinetic Energy is
K.E=\(1/2(0.250)(4)^{2}\)
K.E=1/2(0.125)(16)
K.E=1/2(4)
K.E=2
When the mass of the bottle is 0.125 kg, the Kinetic Energy is
K.E=\(1/2(0.375)(4)^{2}\)
K.E=1/2(0.375)(16)
K.E=1/2(6)
K.E=3
When the mass of the bottle is 0.500 kg, the Kinetic Energy is
K.E=\(1/2(0.500)(4)^{2}\)
K.E=1/2(0.500)(16)
K.E=1/2(8)
K.E=4
Now we can calculate the change in kinetic energy (ΔKE):
ΔKE = KE(final) - KE(initial)
= 4 kg m*2/s*2 - 1 kg m*2/s*2
= 3 kg m*2/s*2
To learn more about kinetic energy :
https://brainly.com/question/8101588
A meteor falls toward Earth's surface. Given that the acceleration due to
gravity is 9.8 m/s^2, what is the meteor's potential energy if it has a mass of 10
kg at an altitude of 400 m?
O A. 408 J
O B. 7,840,000 J
O C. 2J
O D. 39,200 J
Answer:
39,200J
Explanation:
just took the test
The meteor's potential energy if it has a mass of 10kg at an altitude of 400 m will be 39200 J
What is potential energy ?Potential Energy that depend upon the relative position of various parts of system . It is an energy possessed by an object by virtue of its position or configuration.
mass(m) = 10kg
g (acceleration due to gravity) = 9.8m/s^2
altitude(height (h)) = 400m
Meteor's Potential energy = m * g * h
= 10 * 9.8 * 400 = 39200 J
correct option will be a) 39200 J
learn more about Potential Energy :
https://brainly.com/question/14404024?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ3
Please answer B, C, E, and D
Write a report on waves. Some questions you might consider are: What makes a wave? Why are some waves small and some large? How are waves classified? Are there different kinds of waves? What happens when a wave meets the shore? Where in the world do you find the best waves for surfing?
Answer:
The waves have energy that wave back and forth because the waves are never still, they are always moving. There are different types of waves because sometimes (like a tsunami) the waves are affected by other things like the earth plates. Portugal is one of the best places to surf because they have waves that can reach up to 6 to 15 feet high!
Explanation:
( no links) An egg falls off a shelf.
What is the kinetic and potential energy of the egg just before it strikes the ground?
A. potential energy: low
kinetic energy: high
B. potential energy: high
kinetic energy: low
C. potential energy: high
kinetic energy: high
D. potential energy: low
kinetic energy: low