One of the traditional tests of insanity states that "the actions of the accused were the "product of mental disease or defect." This is known more familiarly as the "M'Naghten Rule."
This legal standard for insanity focuses on whether the actions of the accused were the result of a mental disease or defect. The rule was established in the 1843 case of Daniel M'Naghten in England and has since been widely adopted in various jurisdictions, including the United States.
The M'Naghten Rule has two main components. First, it requires that the accused must have a mental disease or defect that significantly impairs their cognitive abilities. Second, it asserts that the accused's criminal actions must be a direct "product" of this mental disorder. In other words, the mental illness must have caused the defendant to either not understand the nature of their actions or not know that their actions were wrong.
This legal test for insanity aims to differentiate between individuals who should be held criminally responsible for their actions and those who should not due to their impaired mental state. Courts applying the M'Naghten Rule will consider expert testimony from mental health professionals to determine whether the accused meets the criteria for insanity.
It is important to note that the M'Naghten Rule has faced criticism over the years, with some arguing that it is outdated and too narrow in scope. As a result, alternative tests for insanity have been developed, such as the Irresistible Impulse Test and the Model Penal Code Test. However, the M'Naghten Rule remains a significant legal standard in many jurisdictions for determining criminal responsibility in cases involving mental illness.
Know more about M'Naghten Rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/14711253
#SPJ11
Why are techniques or rules to interpret the meaning of statutes necessary?
The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.
What is a statute?The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.
The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.
It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.
Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ1
Economists argue that the best way to protect national security and provide for national defense is through _________.
complete embargo
imposition of sanctions
the implementation of isolationism
direct government subsidies
Economists argue that the best way to protect national security and provide for national defense is through direct government subsidies.
Direct government subsidies may be one approach to support national security and defense, but they are not the only one.
Other approaches might include investing in research and development of new technologies, supporting education and training programs to develop the skills needed by the defense industry, providing tax incentives to encourage private investment in national security-related industries, and engaging in international collaborations to share resources and expertise.
Some economists may argue that direct government subsidies are appropriate in certain circumstances, such as when a particular industry is critical to national security and is struggling to compete with foreign competitors.
In these cases, government subsidies may be necessary to ensure that the industry remains viable and can continue to provide the necessary goods and services to support national security.
However, other economists may argue that government subsidies can distort markets, encourage inefficiency, and create a dependence on government support that ultimately undermines national security.
They may argue that a better approach is to create a regulatory environment that encourages private investment and innovation, which can lead to the development of new technologies and capabilities that are essential for national security.
To learn more about subsidies, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30722203
#SPJ11
PLEASE SOLVE THIS! NO LINKS!
Rosa is offering a course on how to properly work a crime scene. She is putting her slides in the accurate order of priority. How should she MOST
accurately order her presentation slides?
ОА.
Make the scene safe. Secure the scene. Document the scene. Collect evidence.
ОВ.
Make the scene safe. Document the scene. Collect evidence. Secure the scene.
Ос.
Secure the scene. Make the scene safe. Document the scene. Collect evidence.
OD
Secure the scene. Collect evidence. Make the scene safe. Document the scene.
Answer: A. make the scene safe, secure the scene, document the scene, collect the evidence.
Explanation: trust
Rosa should present in the order of option (C). Secure the scene. Make the scene safe. Document the scene. Collect evidence
A thorough crime scene examination can turn a chaotic crime scene into hard evidence. Findings can point the law enforcement officers in the right direction, and eventually, help solidify case.
A good examiner will:
First secure the scene so that no one contaminates the scene.Make the scene safe for the examiners to work.Document the scene and with photographs and take statements from the people present their.Then collect the evidences for further investigation and presentation.
Hence, Rosa should present in the order of option (C). Secure the scene. Make the scene safe. Document the scene. Collect evidence
To know more about crime scene investigation:
https://brainly.com/question/1329009
#SPJ3
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
What is a Good Samaritan policy in relation to alcohol abuse
Answer:
Amherst College
Explanation:
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
Angelina and Brad have six kids. They have been secretly separated for a number of years, and they have finally decided to get a divorce. During their separation, the kids
lived primarily with Angelina. However, Brad insists he should get primary custody of the children. If he can't get custody of all of the kids, he is willing to settle for
custody of his three favorite kids and let Angelina have the other three.
What are some of the issues here?
- 12
Pararanh
Which of these is an example of government corruption?
Answer:
Cronyism.
Explanation:
Answer:
cryonislism or however its spelt
Explanation:
the rainy day fund is more properly known as the national research university fund.
T/F
The statement is False as The rainy day fund and the national research university fund are two separate funds with different purposes.
What is the reason?The rainy day fund is a state-level reserve fund set up to help address unexpected budget shortfalls or emergencies. On the other hand, the national research university fund is a higher education funding program aimed at promoting research and innovation at Texas universities.
While both funds are important for the state of Texas, they serve different purposes and should not be confused with each other.
It is important for policymakers and the public to understand the distinctions between various government funds and programs to ensure effective allocation of resources and efficient governance.
To know more on Funds visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30074776
#SPJ11
Police received information from an undercover police officer that she had just seen two men (whom she described) in a red pickup truck selling marijuana to schoolchildren near the city's largest high school. A few minutes later, two police officers saw a pickup truck fitting the description a half block from the high school. The driver of the truck matched the description of one of the men described by the undercover officer. The only passenger was a young woman who was in the back of the truck. The police saw her get out and stand at a nearby bus stop. They stopped the truck and searched the driver. In the pocket of the driver's jacket, the police found a small bottle of pills that they recognized as narcotics. They then broke open a locked toolbox attached to the flatbed of the truck and found a small sealed envelope inside. They opened it and found marijuana. They also found a quantity of cocaine in the glove compartment. After completing their search of the driver and the truck, the police went over to the young woman and searched her purse. In her purse, they found a small quantity of heroin. Both the driver and the young woman were arrested and charged with unlawful possession of narcotics.
If the driver moves to suppress the use as evidence of the marijuana and cocaine found in the search of the truck, the court should
The court should consider the legality of the search and seizure conducted by the police officers. In this situation, the police received a tip from an undercover officer about two men in a red pickup truck selling marijuana near a high school. The police then observed a truck fitting that description and stopped it.
The search of the driver led to the discovery of narcotics in his pocket, which could be considered legal based on probable cause and the reasonable suspicion that the driver was involved in illegal activities. However, the search of the locked toolbox and glove compartment may be subject to scrutiny, as it might require a warrant or further justification for the search.
If the court determines that the search of the toolbox and glove compartment was not justified, it may suppress the marijuana and cocaine as evidence due to the violation of the driver's Fourth Amendment rights, which protect against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Additionally, the search of the young woman's purse may also be subject to scrutiny, as her involvement in the described illegal activities was not initially established. The court will need to examine whether the police had reasonable suspicion or probable cause to search her belongings.
In conclusion, the court should evaluate the legality of the search and seizure based on the provided information and circumstances. If any of the searches are deemed unconstitutional, the court may suppress the respective evidence.
To know more about rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28965018
#SPJ11
can u help me? wut is a good idea for a new amendment how would it benefit people? PLZ HELP WILL GIVE bRaiNLESt if two pEoPLe answer. ;-;
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.
Should the federal judiciary limit the scope of the 1st Amendment's freedom of speech clause, such that 'hate speech', as defined by the federal and/or state sovereigns, would be illegal, with criminal penalties attached? Provide arguments in support of your answer, and you may cite external sources.
The federal judiciary should limit the scope of the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause to criminalize "hate speech" is a complex and debated topic.
Here are two arguments that provide different perspectives on the matter:
Argument in favor of limiting the scope:
Proponents argue that limiting freedom of speech to criminalize hate speech would help protect vulnerable individuals and foster a more inclusive society. They argue that hate speech can perpetuate discrimination, incite violence, and create a hostile environment.
By imposing criminal penalties, it sends a strong message that such speech is not acceptable and helps maintain social harmony. They may cite examples of countries that have implemented hate speech laws and argue that such laws have proven effective in curbing the spread of hate speech and reducing harm.
Argument against limiting the scope:
Opponents argue that protecting freedom of speech, even when it includes hate speech, is essential for a robust democracy. They contend that allowing the government to restrict speech based on its content opens the door to potential abuse and encroachment on other forms of expression.
They argue that hate speech is subjective and its definition can vary across individuals and cultures, which raises concerns about potential censorship of unpopular or dissenting viewpoints. They emphasize the importance of countering hate speech through counter-speech, education, and promoting tolerance rather than relying on legal restrictions.
Learn more about criminalize here
https://brainly.com/question/32339222
#SPJ11
"Pro-death" is a loaded phrase? T or F
Answer:
True
Explanation:
What is the name of the legislature of the federal government of the united states of america?.
Answer:The answer is the united states congress
Answer:
The United States Congress
Explanation:
Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.
examination of bill of entry is done to vouch
Answer:
What? I Don't understand
Explanation:
what major threat has changed the purpose of criminal justice organizations and how they function?
Terrorism is the major threat that has changed the purpose of criminal justice organizations.
A peaceful, accountable, and legitimate response to terrorism can be provided by counter-terrorism initiatives that are based on an effective and open criminal justice system that upholds human rights and the rule of law. This kind of response by the criminal justice system to terrorism can help prevent or reduce the risk of using force in an unreasonable and/or illegal way outside of the safeguards and procedural guarantees provided by the due process of law. Even under terrorist threats, it can bolster a society's commitment to human rights and the rule of law.
The criminal justice system has a challenging role to play in the fight against terrorism. Indeed, the prevention of terrorist attacks must be the primary goal of counterterrorism strategies, and in some instances, law enforcement agencies are able to prevent terrorist attacks. However, when it comes to preventing terrorist conspiracies from achieving their goal or when a terrorist threat is too extensive for resources to handle, some of the current criminal justice practices are less effective . To implement all of the recommended measures for the law enforcement and criminal justice systems with the necessary levels of technical capacity, however, there may be significant accompanying challenges, particularly for States with lower levels of financial resources.
To know more about Terrorism and Criminal Justice visit
brainly.com/question/5171715
#SPJ4
can legal pratictioner be both advocate and judge
Answer:
I believe so
Explanation:
I have no clue I'm a high schooler who likes kpop and life revolves around sleeping 24/7
c. In a criminal case, should a lawyer defend a client he or she knows is guilty? Would you defend someone you knew was guilty? Explain.
Answer: lawyers have a legal responsibility to their clients that they must uphold. This means if the lawyer knows the client is guilty, they must still defend them. That’s there job.
Explanation: The job of a criminal defense lawyer is to defend you against the charges that are presented, know matter what.
Which of the following is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case?
O It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts
O It may be the basis for establishing facts in a later civil case
O It will occur as a part of the trial portion of a criminal prosecution
O It is legally equivalent to a “no contest” plea
The one that is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts. Hence, the correct answer is option A
A criminal case is the one that is liable to sentence punishment. A case that is punishable under law of any country. Hence, one is set to be in a criminal case when one is involved in any form of crime. The severity of the crime determines the gravity of the punishment.
What does guilty plea mean?To plead guilty implies that one accepts that one did the crime charged. If one pleads guilty, the court will decide what should happen next, which could be a fine or a prison sentence.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts.
learn more about guilty plea: https://brainly.com/question/14334271
#SPJ1
True or False, If the statue of Frauds bars the enforcement of an oral contract, a will not impose a quasi contract regardless of the other circumstances. True or False?
Answer:
true it is true it is true
Define the Office of Civil Rights, and its responsibility as it relates to HIPAA.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards, in concert with its enforcement of the Privacy Rule, and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.
Discuss the pros and cons of raising children in correctional institutions. How you expand or limit such programs?
Answer:
Explanation:
While systemic reforms ultimately rely on government policies and action, individuals can play a role as well. Initiatives such as the Harvard Organization for Prison Education and Reform and the Petey Greene Program, for example, send trained volunteers to tutor incarcerated individuals with the dual goal of advocating for structural reforms to prison education. Volunteering to tutor students in prison who are working toward their GEDs will reap rewards for students, tutors, and society.
Among adolescents and adults, alcohol use is involved in up to 70% of deaths
associated with water recreation activities.
TRUE
FALSE
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because its logic
Elaborate the functions of the three-tiered federal court system.
Answer:
The U.S. has a three-tiered structure of courts. The first one or the first level is trial courts. There is the Supreme Court on the second level, and the third level is the federal court. Trial courts or the federal courts look into the state matters dealing with the general public, the Supreme Court, on the other hand, is the highest court of the country, and the federal court is the court to hear the matters of the constitution.
Explanation:
District Courts and Circuit Courts
District courts are the primary or level 1 of the federal court system; the purpose of the district court is to settle the disputes of different states. Also, it is the first place of appeal. They function to deal with civil and criminal cases.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is the only institution where the cases can be challenged after being heard in the circuit courts and district courts. There is only one Supreme Court, and it is of the highest order. The Supreme Court can decide on all the matters concerning civil or state.
Federal Court
Federal court works for the matters of the state. Federal courts take into account only the matters concerning the legislature and high officials. They help the state to deal with the matters of the legislation separately.
-Hope this helps <3
Which of the following are local issues that escalated into national issues? how much time working parents need to have to care for their children not having anyone to take care of a new child in the family
how often trash pick-up should occur
not having rules or regulations set for using dog parks
how many people should be elected to the city council
Answer:
no idea. b
Explanation:
sorry i dont no
Suggest practical strategies that non-governmental organizations can use to combat gender based violence find two organizations which contribute to the fight against gbv give the names of the organizations
Answer:Non-governmental organizations can combat gender-based violence by creating safe spaces for survivors, providing counseling and support services, promoting gender equality, and advocating for policy change. Two organizations that contribute to the fight against GBV are RAINN and UN Women.
Explanation:
greg was placed in juvenile detention following an arrest for sexual assault. which program is greg least likely to participate in while he is being held?
While being held in juvenile detention following an arrest for sexual assault, Greg is least likely to participate in a Community Reintegration Program.
A Community Reintegration Program is designed to assist individuals in transitioning back into the community after their release from detention or incarceration. It focuses on providing support and resources to help reintegrate individuals into society and reduce the likelihood of reoffending.
However, in the case of Greg, who has been arrested for sexual assault, it is less likely that he would participate in such a program while being held in juvenile detention. Instead, his detention period would likely involve more specialized programs and interventions aimed at addressing his specific offense, rehabilitation, and addressing any underlying issues related to his behavior.
Visit here to learn more about sexual assault:
brainly.com/question/1754602
#SPJ11
as part of which international agreement did representatives of 195 nations meet outside paris in late 2015 to discuss lowering planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions?
Representatives of 195 nations met outside Paris in late 2015 as part of the Paris Agreement to discuss lowering planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions.
The international agreement that took place in late 2015, known as the Paris Agreement, brought together representatives from 195 nations to address the issue of climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The negotiations took place in Le Bourget, a suburb of Paris, and resulted in a historic global agreement. The Paris Agreement's primary goal is to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
The participating nations committed to implementing and updating their individual contributions, known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), to reduce emissions and strengthen resilience to the impacts of climate change. The Paris Agreement represents a significant international effort to combat climate change through global cooperation and collective action.
To know more about Paris Agreement click here brainly.com/question/7484470
#SPJ11